4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

How accurate is DA Correction?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 11, 2009 | 10:44 PM
  #1  
tator152's Avatar
tator152
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 98
From: Oklahoma
Default How accurate is DA Correction?

Well i went to the track a while back in my stock 02 GT ran a 14.9@95( I know it sounds sad). well tonight i decided to check my DA for that night and it corrected it to 14.3@98 mph?! It was like 70% humidity and 80 degrees but i don't think the correction is very accurate.
Old Oct 12, 2009 | 12:04 AM
  #2  
tim2002gt's Avatar
tim2002gt
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 670
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

There is alot more to density altitude than just temperature and humidity. Air pressure and track elevation also play a big part in the equation. That being said, as long as the info you provided for the calculation is correct the calculators are usually pretty accurate.

Btw, what part of OK are you from? What track were you running at?
Old Oct 12, 2009 | 12:55 AM
  #3  
72MachOne99GT's Avatar
72MachOne99GT
2010 Blue Ball Award Recipient
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,907
From: Eskimo Village, Indiana *No Igloo*
Default

The biggest debate that arises *especially recently in the SS section* is HOW people use DA corrections.

Basically, in generic terms a DA correction is what your car is 'capable' of running in a standardized situation. Meaning, it's a 'round about' way of comparing your times to what others run in different locations.

Issues arise when people who run in one place that might not be the most ideal, such as the one you seem to have ran at, use that corrected time as their actual run. Then flags get thrown, debates begin, and feelings get hurt.

Easiest way to avoid that is when asked what your car ran, just say what it ran on the slip. But don't be afraid to mention WHERE you ran it. If you still really like seeing the corrected time, list it under the real time.

There, no feelings hurt, and a generic representation of DA Corrections has been provided.

For what it's worth, I think my real time was a 13.636, and my corrected was 13.5XX...not even worth mentioning.
Old Oct 12, 2009 | 11:28 AM
  #4  
tator152's Avatar
tator152
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 98
From: Oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by tim2002gt
There is alot more to density altitude than just temperature and humidity. Air pressure and track elevation also play a big part in the equation. That being said, as long as the info you provided for the calculation is correct the calculators are usually pretty accurate.

Btw, what part of OK are you from? What track were you running at?
Thanks for the info yeah i looked up the weather and put in the air pressure and elevation accurately... and i'm from the oklahoma city area( Tuttle) and i was running at thunder valley in noble. I noticed you were from tulsa, i've seen a lot of people on here from the tulsa area but not too many from the okc area....
Old Oct 12, 2009 | 11:43 AM
  #5  
ChalknCover's Avatar
ChalknCover
Sgt. Killjoy
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,090
From: DMV
Default

It is pretty accurate from what I have noticed. I looked mine up this weekend. Friday night I ran a 14.06 @ 94.26mph with a DA of 1910, it was 78% humidity. Corrected, my time is 13.75 @ 96.41. I cannot tell you how pissed I was that I was unable to break 13's.
Old Oct 12, 2009 | 02:48 PM
  #6  
tator152's Avatar
tator152
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 98
From: Oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by 72MachOne99GT
The biggest debate that arises *especially recently in the SS section* is HOW people use DA corrections.

Basically, in generic terms a DA correction is what your car is 'capable' of running in a standardized situation. Meaning, it's a 'round about' way of comparing your times to what others run in different locations.

Issues arise when people who run in one place that might not be the most ideal, such as the one you seem to have ran at, use that corrected time as their actual run. Then flags get thrown, debates begin, and feelings get hurt.
Yeah thats true i would not tell someone JUST my DA corrected time... i might tell them my real time and then my DA corrected
Old Oct 12, 2009 | 02:55 PM
  #7  
tator152's Avatar
tator152
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 98
From: Oklahoma
Default

Originally Posted by BlueBloodedPony
It is pretty accurate from what I have noticed. I looked mine up this weekend. Friday night I ran a 14.06 @ 94.26mph with a DA of 1910, it was 78% humidity. Corrected, my time is 13.75 @ 96.41. I cannot tell you how pissed I was that I was unable to break 13's.
haha yeah i would be pissed too.. high 13's is the goal for my current car but since i'm just a poor college student i haven't been able to do much modding
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mtgldr
S197 Handling Section
5
Feb 3, 2024 09:00 PM
UrS4
S197 Handling Section
10
Oct 3, 2015 06:23 AM
69Volunteer
Classic Mustang General Discussion
1
Sep 30, 2015 10:39 AM
MonsterBilly
Classic Mustangs (Tech)
4
Sep 20, 2015 06:56 AM
ccdguy
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
1
Sep 19, 2015 05:20 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50 AM.