4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

Cams cams cams!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-26-2009, 11:13 PM
  #11  
mrtstang
6th Gear Member
 
mrtstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MI
Posts: 5,884
Default

The con would be that it will make a little less power than true n/a cams. Other than that, it should be fine.
mrtstang is offline  
Old 11-27-2009, 10:57 AM
  #12  
marcosbullock
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
marcosbullock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 51
Default

Originally Posted by mrtstang
The con would be that it will make a little less power than true n/a cams. Other than that, it should be fine.
Man...decisions decisions.
marcosbullock is offline  
Old 11-27-2009, 06:20 PM
  #13  
Mustang_NTriangle
5th Gear Member
 
Mustang_NTriangle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: MA
Posts: 2,402
Default

Originally Posted by marcosbullock
Man...decisions decisions.
you would be crazy to buy na cams if you know in the future that you are going FI and you won't leave that much power on the table vs. associated costs of buying new cams again in the future.

You say that you want the most power for you car but what is your plans for your car? Drag car only, weekend warrior, daily driver???

Remember a huge cams means with the biggest numbers is just plain stupid unless you have an all out drag car as you lose your low and mid range power curve which is very important always over looked... just something to consider.
Mustang_NTriangle is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
19
12-19-2023 01:12 PM
patchshaffer
Tuner Central
3
10-05-2015 02:24 PM
uedlose
The Racers Bench
4
10-01-2015 08:31 PM
junior04
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
1
09-28-2015 10:53 AM
Ryan Fitzpatrick
New Member Area
3
09-14-2015 02:21 AM



Quick Reply: Cams cams cams!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:08 AM.