4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

Another cam thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 19, 2009 | 11:31 PM
  #31  
JayC's Avatar
JayC
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,860
From:
Default

Lots of info (good and bad) in those threads. All of it I have read before, by the way.
Nick , how many different engines/heads were used in your test? Unless there are variations from engine to engine I see no explanation as to why so many have NOT had PTV problems with the CMS/VT Stage II's.
Old Dec 20, 2009 | 11:39 AM
  #32  
nickmckinney's Avatar
nickmckinney
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 570
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by stangalator
great info here. thanks guys! I would need some adjustable cam gears to adjust center lines and degree any cams, correct?

Keeping this in mind, what cam would you then think is correct for me? My pi heads are port match and the castings are cleaned up on the intake side with a mirror finished exhaust side.

Im leaning towards the mhs stage 2's or maybe mhs stage 2.5's, i dont want bent valves


edit:

mhs 2's
225/223 550/500 110/110
mhs 2.5's
228/226 550/500 110/110

so maybe the 2.5's would be a little better?

2.5 makes more top end power and needs a modified or aftermarket intake valve to work. Its the biggest cam we offer with a stock piston.
Old Dec 20, 2009 | 11:40 AM
  #33  
nickmckinney's Avatar
nickmckinney
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 570
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by lizzyfan
Good stuff Nick!!!
My question to you is: Will the TF heads help with PTV clearance with the relocated valve??

You pretty much don't need to even think about PTV with the TFS head. Any cam that will cause PTV with the TFS head is a 8000+ monster.
Old Dec 20, 2009 | 11:50 AM
  #34  
nickmckinney's Avatar
nickmckinney
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 570
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by JayC
Lots of info (good and bad) in those threads. All of it I have read before, by the way.
Nick , how many different engines/heads were used in your test? Unless there are variations from engine to engine I see no explanation as to why so many have NOT had PTV problems with the CMS/VT Stage II's.

The variations are in the cam gears, like I said 0.005" does clear. So if your gears are straight up (about half are) or retarded slightly (about a quarter are) and/or your heads were decked before you installed them (0.008" typical retards the cam 0.5 degrees) you will clear.

I have built and pulled apart a few dozen modulars and never saw a 4.6 with the piston more than 0.018" in the hole. Most run 0.012" to 0.015". They are very tight spec engines other than the cam gears.

And finally the saving grace to this motor, the stock PI valve is the hardest material I have ever seen used in a valve and the stock pistons are pretty hard too. If you touch a 60-80's Chevy or Ford small block valve to a piston you either bend the valve or shatter the piston. On the 4.6 PI the stock valve will cut into the piston about 0.005" or so making cute little eyebrow shaped reliefs. I know of no other motor you can do this on. Aftermarket SS valves will bend a ton faster than the stock stuff since they are softer.

Like I said, get another stock motor (they are cheap enough), install a set of cams and see for yourself. If the motor makes tapping sounds right after installing a set of cams and the tapping goes away after a few minutes I would wager you now have some cute reliefs in your pistons and many have reported this from decently running engines after they took them apart.
Old Dec 20, 2009 | 11:56 AM
  #35  
WannaBeGearHead's Avatar
WannaBeGearHead
Go Texas!!!
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 4,613
From: Lincoln, NE
Default

So if the piston and valves are hitting, is that something a person would hear once installed? And what would those "cute" reliefs in your pistons do? I mean how would that affect the cars performance other than making notches in your pistons that you didn't want?
Old Dec 20, 2009 | 12:04 PM
  #36  
nickmckinney's Avatar
nickmckinney
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 570
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by WannaBeGearHead
So if the piston and valves are hitting, is that something a person would hear once installed? And what would those "cute" reliefs in your pistons do? I mean how would that affect the cars performance other than making notches in your pistons that you didn't want?

People report this "tapping" noise all the time after installing certain performance cams, funny thing as I have never heard it once myself.

The reliefs allow the valve the extra clearance it needs to operate, the reliefs themselves don't do anything to the power of the engine.

In reality we all want reliefs in our pistons as that is the main hindrance to running good cam specs for these motors. Once you install reliefs for the intake valve you can pretty much run any cam spec you want.
Old Dec 20, 2009 | 12:06 PM
  #37  
stangalator's Avatar
stangalator
Thread Starter
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,306
From: New York
Default

so getting some of the mhs cam gears which are closer to spec then stock and some cms stage 2's would be alright then. because the lose spec area of the engine is the gears them selves? I originally wanted the cms cams this is why I ask.
Old Dec 20, 2009 | 12:08 PM
  #38  
lizzyfan's Avatar
lizzyfan
Underboss
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 20,272
From: Helaware
Default

Originally Posted by nickmckinney
You pretty much don't need to even think about PTV with the TFS head. Any cam that will cause PTV with the TFS head is a 8000+ monster.
Thank you sir!!!
Old Dec 21, 2009 | 09:11 AM
  #39  
nickmckinney's Avatar
nickmckinney
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 570
From: Florida
Default

BTW - here is the mark the valve makes on the piston, its circled in red (and yes this piston has other problems)


Old Dec 21, 2009 | 09:13 AM
  #40  
nickmckinney's Avatar
nickmckinney
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 570
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by stangalator
so getting some of the mhs cam gears which are closer to spec then stock and some cms stage 2's would be alright then. because the lose spec area of the engine is the gears them selves? I originally wanted the cms cams this is why I ask.

Others may say 0.005" is "alright" but that will never come out of my mouth. I have enough trouble getting old schoolers to believe that 0.035" is enough as most engine builders are used to 0.070" minimum which was the pushrod spec for decades.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:52 PM.