Mustang dyno numbers!!!
#11
Makes sense. He added Heads + dyno tune. Mustang dynos typically read lower. He would probably put down 330-340 rwhp on a dyno jet. Nothing too farfetched.
#16
Maybe things have changed since my 4.6 days. But, I just don't see those numbers even with cams. Just my .02
#17
Mustang Dynos don't alway read lower. My car was originally tuned on a Mustang Dyno and made 385/370. It was running a little lean at 6000 so I had it re-tuned at a different shop that had a Dynojet. The first pull was 385/367. About the same.
#18
I believe the 311, but 330-340 rwhp isn't realistic for just basic bolt-ons, stock compression, stage 2 heads/cams on a properly calibrated dyno.
#19
You tell me...
Just kidding. Those are the stupid wheels I bought when I sold my saleens. I went to the dealership today and there looks like to be some good news boys.. Im keeping it a secret for now the exact status.
Huh? He put 311 on a mustang dyno. Translate that to a dyno jet, assuming that the weight and all other factors are correct, will translate that to 330ish rwhp on a dyno jet.
So let me get this straight. People are putting down 300 RWHP with CMS stage 2 cams and Hitech Stage 2 cams with out heads and full bolt ons, yet you don't believe that people can do 330 rwhp with stage 2 heads? Its been done plenty of times before. Especially with CMS stage 2 cams.
Idk, I think differently I guess. Just doesn't seem too farfetched when it has been achieved before.
Just kidding. Those are the stupid wheels I bought when I sold my saleens. I went to the dealership today and there looks like to be some good news boys.. Im keeping it a secret for now the exact status.
Mitch, not much has changed. There hasn't been a car like the bucket around to remind people what a full out N/A 4.6 2v makes with the best parts available.
I believe the 311, but 330-340 rwhp isn't realistic for just basic bolt-ons, stock compression, stage 2 heads/cams on a properly calibrated dyno.
I believe the 311, but 330-340 rwhp isn't realistic for just basic bolt-ons, stock compression, stage 2 heads/cams on a properly calibrated dyno.
So let me get this straight. People are putting down 300 RWHP with CMS stage 2 cams and Hitech Stage 2 cams with out heads and full bolt ons, yet you don't believe that people can do 330 rwhp with stage 2 heads? Its been done plenty of times before. Especially with CMS stage 2 cams.
Idk, I think differently I guess. Just doesn't seem too farfetched when it has been achieved before.
#20
Huh? He put 311 on a mustang dyno. Translate that to a dyno jet, assuming that the weight and all other factors are correct, will translate that to 330ish rwhp on a dyno jet.
So let me get this straight. People are putting down 300 RWHP with CMS stage 2 cams and Hitech Stage 2 cams with out heads and full bolt ons, yet you don't believe that people can do 330 rwhp with stage 2 heads? Its been done plenty of times before. Especially with CMS stage 2 cams.
Idk, I think differently I guess. Just doesn't seem too farfetched when it has been achieved before.
So let me get this straight. People are putting down 300 RWHP with CMS stage 2 cams and Hitech Stage 2 cams with out heads and full bolt ons, yet you don't believe that people can do 330 rwhp with stage 2 heads? Its been done plenty of times before. Especially with CMS stage 2 cams.
Idk, I think differently I guess. Just doesn't seem too farfetched when it has been achieved before.
I'm just saying for a stage 2 heads and cam N/A 2v running stock compression and basic bolt-ons, an honest 330-340rwhp seems a little high. It's certainly not impossible for these cars to hit those numbers, it just takes a little more usually than what he has mentioned so far. BTW I don't remember reading anywhere in this thread about what cams he is running or who's ported heads either. It can make a huge difference.