4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

Mustang dyno numbers!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-01-2010, 07:59 PM
  #11  
GTRACER88
5th Gear Member
 
GTRACER88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 2,112
Default

Originally Posted by WannaBeGearHead
So you made 292/306 on a dynojet then after only a tune you made 311/322 on a Mustang dyno???

Doesn't make sense unless I'm missing something.
Makes sense. He added Heads + dyno tune. Mustang dynos typically read lower. He would probably put down 330-340 rwhp on a dyno jet. Nothing too farfetched.
GTRACER88 is offline  
Old 06-02-2010, 09:24 AM
  #12  
quickndslick2
Banned
Thread Starter
 
quickndslick2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: fl
Posts: 209
Default

exactly gtracer thanks for responding
quickndslick2 is offline  
Old 06-02-2010, 09:58 AM
  #13  
code3GT
Mustang Nazi
 
code3GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Texas, baby
Posts: 13,444
Default

I don't see those kinda numbers with your mods. But hey, that's just me.
code3GT is offline  
Old 06-02-2010, 12:10 PM
  #14  
GTRACER88
5th Gear Member
 
GTRACER88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 2,112
Default

He is pretty much full bolt on right? If so I believe it. It also can be a happy mustang dyno. But 330 isn't too far fetched for full bolt ons with heads and cams..
GTRACER88 is offline  
Old 06-02-2010, 12:22 PM
  #15  
PurpleIcedGT
6th Gear Member
 
PurpleIcedGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 6,028
Default

GTRACER what is the status on your new set of wheels?
PurpleIcedGT is offline  
Old 06-02-2010, 02:35 PM
  #16  
code3GT
Mustang Nazi
 
code3GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Texas, baby
Posts: 13,444
Default

Originally Posted by GTRACER88
He is pretty much full bolt on right? If so I believe it. It also can be a happy mustang dyno. But 330 isn't too far fetched for full bolt ons with heads and cams..
Maybe things have changed since my 4.6 days. But, I just don't see those numbers even with cams. Just my .02
code3GT is offline  
Old 06-02-2010, 02:42 PM
  #17  
Eagle2000GT
4th Gear Member
 
Eagle2000GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Shelbyville, Indiana
Posts: 1,088
Default

Mustang Dynos don't alway read lower. My car was originally tuned on a Mustang Dyno and made 385/370. It was running a little lean at 6000 so I had it re-tuned at a different shop that had a Dynojet. The first pull was 385/367. About the same.
Eagle2000GT is offline  
Old 06-02-2010, 07:40 PM
  #18  
tbirdscwd
5th Gear Member
 
tbirdscwd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 4,039
Default

Originally Posted by 1SLO85
Maybe things have changed since my 4.6 days. But, I just don't see those numbers even with cams. Just my .02
Mitch, not much has changed. There hasn't been a car like the bucket around to remind people what a full out N/A 4.6 2v makes with the best parts available.

I believe the 311, but 330-340 rwhp isn't realistic for just basic bolt-ons, stock compression, stage 2 heads/cams on a properly calibrated dyno.
tbirdscwd is offline  
Old 06-02-2010, 08:53 PM
  #19  
GTRACER88
5th Gear Member
 
GTRACER88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 2,112
Default

Originally Posted by SonicMustang143
GTRACER what is the status on your new set of wheels?
You tell me...



Just kidding. Those are the stupid wheels I bought when I sold my saleens. I went to the dealership today and there looks like to be some good news boys.. Im keeping it a secret for now the exact status.

Originally Posted by tbirdscwd
Mitch, not much has changed. There hasn't been a car like the bucket around to remind people what a full out N/A 4.6 2v makes with the best parts available.

I believe the 311, but 330-340 rwhp isn't realistic for just basic bolt-ons, stock compression, stage 2 heads/cams on a properly calibrated dyno.
Huh? He put 311 on a mustang dyno. Translate that to a dyno jet, assuming that the weight and all other factors are correct, will translate that to 330ish rwhp on a dyno jet.

So let me get this straight. People are putting down 300 RWHP with CMS stage 2 cams and Hitech Stage 2 cams with out heads and full bolt ons, yet you don't believe that people can do 330 rwhp with stage 2 heads? Its been done plenty of times before. Especially with CMS stage 2 cams.

Idk, I think differently I guess. Just doesn't seem too farfetched when it has been achieved before.
GTRACER88 is offline  
Old 06-02-2010, 11:06 PM
  #20  
tbirdscwd
5th Gear Member
 
tbirdscwd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 4,039
Default

Originally Posted by GTRACER88
Huh? He put 311 on a mustang dyno. Translate that to a dyno jet, assuming that the weight and all other factors are correct, will translate that to 330ish rwhp on a dyno jet.

So let me get this straight. People are putting down 300 RWHP with CMS stage 2 cams and Hitech Stage 2 cams with out heads and full bolt ons, yet you don't believe that people can do 330 rwhp with stage 2 heads? Its been done plenty of times before. Especially with CMS stage 2 cams.

Idk, I think differently I guess. Just doesn't seem too farfetched when it has been achieved before.
People tend to forget that there is no global percent you can just multiply a Mustang Dyno's number by and spit out a Dynojet estimate. Depending on calibration and the data for the car entered by the tuner, the dyno can read basically anything. Every dyno tech I have ever talked to has refered to their dyno as "The Heartbreaker." Nobody is going to tell a customer "yeah, but our dyno reads high. You probably are making a little less than that." I think seeing what he traps in the quarter will be a better indicator of what he is truly putting down.

I'm just saying for a stage 2 heads and cam N/A 2v running stock compression and basic bolt-ons, an honest 330-340rwhp seems a little high. It's certainly not impossible for these cars to hit those numbers, it just takes a little more usually than what he has mentioned so far. BTW I don't remember reading anywhere in this thread about what cams he is running or who's ported heads either. It can make a huge difference.
tbirdscwd is offline  


Quick Reply: Mustang dyno numbers!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 AM.