4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

Which to get first? Tuner or 70mm TB?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-10-2010, 08:58 AM
  #21  
tightdogal
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
tightdogal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 3,411
Default

Originally Posted by cliffyk
Do you wish to tune it yourself, or pay to have it done?

The other change I would recommend, based on my recent experience, is to upgrade the fuel injectors to the FRPP 24lb/h EV6 units. I have not been up on the rollers since installing these, however the butt dyno and my G-Tech both report a good kick in the pants at WOT and in the 4500-6000 rpm range.

You will need to change the injector low and high slopes, breakpoint, and minimum pulse width settings in the tune to use these...
I like the handheld tuners so I can be able to just tune it myself. IE When I want to use it as a daily driver, use my OEM tune, but when I head to the track, use a 93 octane tune.
tightdogal is offline  
Old 11-10-2010, 02:51 PM
  #22  
MU71L4710N
5th Gear Member
 
MU71L4710N's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 3,189
Default

That's dumb. The 93 tune should be your daily driver tune you get better gas mileage that way
MU71L4710N is offline  
Old 11-10-2010, 03:04 PM
  #23  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

Another issue is that you really should run at least one full tank (preferably two) of 93 octane fuel through the engine before switching from a tune configured for 87 octane, to one optimised for 93.
cliffyk is offline  
Old 11-10-2010, 03:32 PM
  #24  
H0SS302
6th Gear Member
 
H0SS302's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 10,551
Default

Didnt read the thread, but ill say my piece.

If your gonna stay with a bolt on GT for a while, skip the intake mods entirely (IMO). For the money you will spend on a CAI and a tb/plenum(around 400-600 for top of the line parts) your going to get minimal actual RWHP out of it.

The real gains for a bolt on car are the exhaust, and a tune. Long tube headers, o/r x pipe and a straight through muffler catback and a tune (and if your really getting antsy to spend money put in a K&N filter) will net you somewhere around 30 RWHP. A full exhaust was the only mod I put on that I could actually feel. When I nailed the tune you could definitely tell that something was done to the car.

I really dont think you need to touch the intake side until you do some head work on the car.
H0SS302 is offline  
Old 11-10-2010, 03:45 PM
  #25  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

I agree 110% about the CAI, however the stock upper plenum is a weak point.

Replacing it with any of the after market units and a 70mm TB can be done for $200 or so, and with an optimised tune will provide noticeable and worthwhile gains in the upper mid-range and higher rpms.

That said, without an optimised tune (or for those that never rev the engine beyond 3500 rpm) there will be little if any benefit.
cliffyk is offline  
Old 11-10-2010, 04:25 PM
  #26  
tightdogal
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
tightdogal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 3,411
Default

Originally Posted by MU71L4710N
That's dumb. The 93 tune should be your daily driver tune you get better gas mileage that way
Really? I didn't know. I would always think I'd get worse gas mileage Mmmm okay.
tightdogal is offline  
Old 11-10-2010, 04:43 PM
  #27  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

Originally Posted by tightdogal
Really? I didn't know. I would always think I'd get worse gas mileage Mmmm okay.
Think about it this way--why would increasing engine efficiency (which is where added power comes from) decrease fuel economy?

Fuel economy does sometimes suffer after an engine has been modified/tuned to achieve increased power, however this is almost always because the increased power has a way of making people's right foot heavier...
cliffyk is offline  
Old 11-10-2010, 04:59 PM
  #28  
TRUEBLUE3934
4th Gear Member
 
TRUEBLUE3934's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 1,481
Default

Originally Posted by tightdogal
Really? I didn't know. I would always think I'd get worse gas mileage Mmmm okay.
You'll have to get at least 8% better fuel mileage just to pay for the more expensive gasoline.

The comment about running out the tank at least once, depending upon how low you run your car between fill-ups, is a good idea before switching tunes. If you mix 93 oct with some 87 oct, you certainly will not have 93 oct going into the motor.
TRUEBLUE3934 is offline  
Old 11-10-2010, 05:10 PM
  #29  
schmallz
2nd Gear Member
 
schmallz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 392
Default

Originally Posted by tightdogal
Really? I didn't know. I would always think I'd get worse gas mileage Mmmm okay.
Why would you get worse milage if you were only increasing the octane of the fuel? Same amount of fuel, but more power is made...

You could have 93 street tune
93 Race tune
and
100 Octane Street Blaze Race tune.
Sine you want the SCT, with 3 options.

That 100 octane stuff ain't exactly cheap, but it's better than octane boosters.
schmallz is offline  
Old 11-10-2010, 05:31 PM
  #30  
cliffyk
TECH SAVANT
 
cliffyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Posts: 10,938
Default

Originally Posted by TRUEBLUE3934
You'll have to get at least 8% better fuel mileage just to pay for the more expensive gasoline.

The comment about running out the tank at least once, depending upon how low you run your car between fill-ups, is a good idea before switching tunes. If you mix 93 oct with some 87 oct, you certainly will not have 93 oct going into the motor.
It costs me about $4.50 extra at each fill-up to run 93 octane, about the same as a couple beers at a cheap place, worth every penny to me...
cliffyk is offline  


Quick Reply: Which to get first? Tuner or 70mm TB?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:10 PM.