96 GT
11-12-2010, 06:54 AM
#11
Theres another member on this forum called "cobrafrenzy". He has a 97 GT with longtubes,offroad x, pullies, CAI,tune and the car spun 194RWHP.
11-12-2010, 07:43 AM
#12
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 10,551
ya, i would of never done that because i didnt think it had any effect on performance, but im pretty sure its pushin more than 190 to the wheels, the car only has 90k and performance mods include,long tube headers, jegs xpipe, k&n cold air intake, performance hand held tuner, 3.73 gears, steeda underdrive pullys, and the timing is advanced. so im guessing 280 to the wheels, something around that. what u guys think?
You wish you had 280 to the wheels.
11-12-2010, 07:47 AM
#13
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,312
You could buy my heads and cams that im selling and make some power. I made 273rwhp with full bolts with them.
11-12-2010, 07:55 AM
#14
Lolz at the lolz puss, as state above red made 273 with full bolt ons along with heads and cams. Without those heads and cams ur sittin in the 190-210 range unfortuantly.
11-12-2010, 12:08 PM
#15
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 3,189
LMAO you arent even making 273 to your crank, much less your wheels.
for future reference, don't just throw numbers out there for how much HP your making when you literally have no idea. makes you look foolish.
for future reference, don't just throw numbers out there for how much HP your making when you literally have no idea. makes you look foolish.
11-12-2010, 04:56 PM
#16
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 4,951
ya, i would of never done that because i didnt think it had any effect on performance, but im pretty sure its pushin more than 190 to the wheels, the car only has 90k and performance mods include,long tube headers, jegs xpipe, k&n cold air intake, performance hand held tuner, 3.73 gears, steeda underdrive pullys, and the timing is advanced. so im guessing 280 to the wheels, something around that. what u guys think?
11-12-2010, 05:17 PM
#17
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: washington
Posts: 38
WELL THAT **** IS PRETTY QUICK AND IT RAN A HIGH 13 IN THE QUATER MILE. THATS NOT TO BAD SO IM PRETTY SURE ITS PUSHIN MORE THAN 250 ILL DYNO THAT **** AND PROVE U ALL WRONGE ILL POST THE DYNO SHEETS SOON!
11-12-2010, 05:50 PM
#19
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 10,551
But, why should you listen to us, its not like we own the updated version of your car or anything. Its not like we have the updated heads, cams, and intake that ford put out because of the fact that YOUR body style has the most god awful top end of any motor pretty much ever.
What do we know?
11-12-2010, 05:53 PM
#20
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 4,951
Look, I'm sorry you bought a 96 2v and thought it was a rocket ship because it's a Mustang, but fact of the matter is that a basic bolt-on NPI 2v is slow.
But I'm sure you'll prove us all wrong, I'm looking forward to it actually. If your bolt on NPI 2v can make 280rwhp than my HCI 4v must be well into the thousands. And something like Ox's old setup didn't go down the 1/4 mile, it stayed stationary and just rotated the earth until the finish line was under it.