ANTI-CAI
01-17-2011, 09:57 PM
#22
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 10,551
I read an article a while back (I think it was an SAE article) saying that factory intakes are designed in such a way to create a certain turbulence of airflow into the motor. Ford could have easily made a smooth, slick path to keep the already laminar airflow from the MAF screen as straight as possible to the TB, but they didnt. The ribs effect the intake velocity, I would imagine they are there more than anything to get the desired fluid flow velocity into the motor without creating bottlenecks.
The article never went in depth on any particular make from what I remember, just outlined the basic principals on the matter.
The article never went in depth on any particular make from what I remember, just outlined the basic principals on the matter.
Last edited by H0SS302; 01-17-2011 at 10:01 PM.
01-18-2011, 04:54 PM
#23
and i remember that thread a while ago, whoever posted it had some numbers and all this crap in it to show that k&n was bad or something compared to other aftermarket filters
Last edited by MCxQubed; 01-18-2011 at 04:58 PM.
01-18-2011, 06:49 PM
#24
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Alpharetta, Ga
Posts: 762
01-18-2011, 08:39 PM
#25
01-18-2011, 08:51 PM
#27
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: saskatchewan
Posts: 354
The 05-up seem to benefit from a cai but in our cars it isnt worth the money as a performance mod but they do look nice...I don't believe in heat soak as the air takes maybe 3 seconds to get from filter to cylinder so if I was to get one it would be the shiny chrome one and I would put stickers on it
01-18-2011, 10:27 PM
#28
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NJ / MA
Posts: 1,337
i like the JLT myself looks wise.
and i remember a post some time ago that had all kinds of filters that were tested, and K&N seemed to allow more dirt to flow by and clogged up faster, i think the test was "sponsored" or done by AC Delco or something, so i dont know how "reliable" those tests are but hey, i guess it kinda makes sense, in order to flow more you gotta let more **** in the air by. but then again there's people out there that swear by them turbonator things too haha.
and i remember a post some time ago that had all kinds of filters that were tested, and K&N seemed to allow more dirt to flow by and clogged up faster, i think the test was "sponsored" or done by AC Delco or something, so i dont know how "reliable" those tests are but hey, i guess it kinda makes sense, in order to flow more you gotta let more **** in the air by. but then again there's people out there that swear by them turbonator things too haha.
01-19-2011, 08:34 AM
#29
i like the JLT myself looks wise.
and i remember a post some time ago that had all kinds of filters that were tested, and K&N seemed to allow more dirt to flow by and clogged up faster, i think the test was "sponsored" or done by AC Delco or something, so i dont know how "reliable" those tests are but hey, i guess it kinda makes sense, in order to flow more you gotta let more **** in the air by. but then again there's people out there that swear by them turbonator things too haha.
and i remember a post some time ago that had all kinds of filters that were tested, and K&N seemed to allow more dirt to flow by and clogged up faster, i think the test was "sponsored" or done by AC Delco or something, so i dont know how "reliable" those tests are but hey, i guess it kinda makes sense, in order to flow more you gotta let more **** in the air by. but then again there's people out there that swear by them turbonator things too haha.