4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

354rwhp/330rwtq N/A 2v. Thanks you TFS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-17-2011, 11:52 PM
  #21  
WannaBeGearHead
Go Texas!!!
 
WannaBeGearHead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 4,613
Default

Originally Posted by WhiteFoxGT
Its not hurting my feelings. I have seen it.. and personally know of 2 people locally to me that have done it.

Im not talkin down on the guy's setup personally.. its just tbird is sack riding it like its god's gift to 2v dyno sheets... when obviously, to most of us, its not that impressive. Great numbers, just not enough to make a dedicated thread and expect the masses to swing all over this guys nuts. Go back to trolling
For how much money he spent on the setup I'm not impressed either BUT price aside I think those are good numbers for a 2v, nothing to get a hard on over.

The TFS heads are giving him about 20-30 extra hp as most people with a built motor, H/C/I on pump gas usually make around 320-330. For $800 more he is getting 20-30hp. Most people spend more than that on cams for the same amount of power gains.

Last edited by WannaBeGearHead; 03-17-2011 at 11:55 PM.
WannaBeGearHead is offline  
Old 03-18-2011, 12:18 AM
  #22  
teej281
4.6L Section Moderator
 
teej281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 10,286
Default

Funny thing is, some guy took an 01 cobra shortblock, threw tfs heads and some bullet racing cams in there and made around 350rwhp, and I think it was through an auto as well. Stroking a mod motor has proven not to yield a gain worth the money, and puts more stress on the internals anyways.

And if you took a look at the guy's sig, he put this motor in a car thats got a sound system in it and such, with a race weight of 3750lbs.

Thanks for the advice wannabe. Just went and told him he should have researched his build better before pulling the trigger and what he should revisit to maximize the potential of his shortblock.
teej281 is offline  
Old 03-18-2011, 06:07 AM
  #23  
uberstang1
Chupacabra
 
uberstang1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: wilkes-barre PA
Posts: 9,621
Default

So before this thread blows up into a flame war about cost of this cost of that. I'll just be the real big ***** and say instead of doing a 2v or blower just spend 8k and drop in a pushrod stroker big block that makes 600rwhp NA with a carb. As charlie would say, WINNNNNNNINNNNNNNG.
uberstang1 is offline  
Old 03-18-2011, 07:12 AM
  #24  
teej281
4.6L Section Moderator
 
teej281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 10,286
Default

Nah, too heavy. I'd do a 347 stroker or 408/427 stroker in there before a big block stroker. Probably a 347 though.
teej281 is offline  
Old 03-18-2011, 07:24 AM
  #25  
WannaBeGearHead
Go Texas!!!
 
WannaBeGearHead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 4,613
Default

Originally Posted by teej281
Thanks for the advice wannabe. Just went and told him he should have researched his build better before pulling the trigger and what he should revisit to maximize the potential of his shortblock.
Haha you tell him Teej

I never understood why people put heavy subs and amps in these cars. Seems wrong.
WannaBeGearHead is offline  
Old 03-18-2011, 08:04 AM
  #26  
teej281
4.6L Section Moderator
 
teej281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 10,286
Default

Yea, do that to a honda or an escalade, not a mustang. They have weight and balance issues enough.
teej281 is offline  
Old 03-18-2011, 08:31 AM
  #27  
boduke0220
6th Gear Member
 
boduke0220's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Yadkin, Nc
Posts: 5,183
Default

Originally Posted by teej281
Ok, I dont know what people arent getting about these kinds of setups. You need TFS-specific cams, you need the correct intake manifold, and you need to tach them out to 7500+RPM to reach their potential!!! This kind of stuff really makes me perturbed just because people mismatch their setups. 354rwhp is not at the height of what that setup should be capable. I dont know what his compression is, but he needs a better set of cams that are head-specific, higher compression, and a tuner that knows what he is doing, because frankly anyone that doesnt tach out a built longblock car to at least 7000rpm is a fool.

The TFS head is good for 3 setups.

1. Stock shortblock with decent cams and stock intake manifold to keep rpm's down and make compression go up.
2. Built shortblock with aggressive cams, short runner intake manifold, and LOTS OF RPM!
3. Any kind of boosted application where increased flow is wanted.

Also, for those of you who dont know, big bore will unshroud the valves and allow for more flow from the heads, so any/all help in that area we can get is much welcomed. Plus, with the Boss block available, that makes it really nice for us mod motor guys to get more flow. Ultimate setup for N/A TFS heads in my book: Nice billet high compression(12:1+) rotating assembly inside a Boss block(aluminum or iron), CMS stage 4 TFS Spec cams, TFS intake manifold with adapter for twin blade throttle body. That setup would be where its at for an N/A 2v. I would guess that with the right fuel, like race gas or E85, that that setup would reach high 3xx's rwhp.

But people continue to mismatch setups and make people unimpressed.
I agree, seems like no one wants to think it out. theres deff 360-370rwhp out of these bad boys on pump. cool build nonetheless though


however 408 stroker > 347 stroker all day. stock 302 block FTL...dart block is some high $ to do a badazz 347
boduke0220 is offline  
Old 03-18-2011, 08:36 AM
  #28  
uberstang1
Chupacabra
 
uberstang1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: wilkes-barre PA
Posts: 9,621
Default

535 bb stroker with nasty heads greater than windsor stroker.
uberstang1 is offline  
Old 03-18-2011, 08:44 AM
  #29  
teej281
4.6L Section Moderator
 
teej281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 10,286
Default

Well for you straight line guys, yea by all means add a billion pounds to the front end of the car. I want a more nimble, lighter front end. If I did this build, i'd be going with an aluminum dart block with high compression and some stout afr heads i'd say.
teej281 is offline  
Old 03-18-2011, 10:02 AM
  #30  
WhiteFoxGT
Resident Ford Troll
 
WhiteFoxGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Delaware
Posts: 6,717
Default

Ok teej, how about a destroked 302, or a 289 that will rev out to like 9500... nascar style rpms baybayyyyy
WhiteFoxGT is offline  


Quick Reply: 354rwhp/330rwtq N/A 2v. Thanks you TFS



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:03 AM.