4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

What's the cheapest way to ADD 100 HP to a stock stang?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 27, 2011 | 09:10 PM
  #21  
7gtthrilla's Avatar
7gtthrilla
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 228
From: South Carolina
Default

Personally, I wouldn't get 4.30 gears, unless you love to shift. I would go with the 4.10's. You get off the line quick and even if you don't start from a stand still you'll still have enough torque to beat him. I would go with the supercharger or either a turbo IMO.
Old Apr 27, 2011 | 09:11 PM
  #22  
Soldier GT's Avatar
Soldier GT
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,688
From: MO/ Born and raised in Louisiana
Default

Originally Posted by jayglaze
2011 charger rt 5.7L/370-hp/395-lb-ft OHV 16-valve V-8
13.9 sec @ 103.6 mph 5.3 0-60 4319lbs
Dodge had a very good idea (engine wise) but the weight of the car is killing it..
Old Apr 27, 2011 | 09:15 PM
  #23  
jayglaze's Avatar
jayglaze
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 38
From: florida
Default

Ford Mustang GT** 1999 0-60 5.4. 1/4 14 sec
3006 lbs... Sorry this took 2 posts I'm a little newbish at this kinda shenanigans
Old Apr 27, 2011 | 09:19 PM
  #24  
jayglaze's Avatar
jayglaze
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 38
From: florida
Default

The times I got from motortrend website so they are professional drivers...
Old Apr 27, 2011 | 09:27 PM
  #25  
jayglaze's Avatar
jayglaze
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 38
From: florida
Default

Originally Posted by Soldier GT
Dodge had a very good idea (engine wise) but the weight of the car is killing it..
Well fortunately for dodge the two cars are in different classes. But even the challenger weighs a ton. Chrysler in general uses the same frame for the charger/challenger/300 to save money ( almost positive on this)
Old Apr 27, 2011 | 09:31 PM
  #26  
jayglaze's Avatar
jayglaze
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 38
From: florida
Default

Originally Posted by turbo232
is that an actual everyday driver time or a magazine time
Magazine time
Old Apr 27, 2011 | 09:33 PM
  #27  
mrtstang's Avatar
mrtstang
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,884
From: MI
Default

The OP is already looking at 4.30's, tune, CAI, and a cat back...more than enough to take out the R/T.
Old Apr 27, 2011 | 09:45 PM
  #28  
speedkills's Avatar
speedkills
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 566
From: Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by jayglaze
Well fortunately for dodge the two cars are in different classes. But even the challenger weighs a ton. Chrysler in general uses the same frame for the charger/challenger/300 to save money ( almost positive on this)
This is true. All of these cars share the same platform, which is based off an old Mercedes e-class. Also the charger has 2.82 gears.

I don't know how this helps, but it's good info.
Old Apr 27, 2011 | 09:52 PM
  #29  
turbo232's Avatar
turbo232
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,232
From: GA
Default

i used to destroy Chargers with my V6 at 276 rwhp and 299 torque with 4.10s. it got even better when i got tires that could hook
Old Apr 27, 2011 | 11:09 PM
  #30  
TRUEBLUE3934's Avatar
TRUEBLUE3934
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,481
From: NC
Default

A lot of good comments on this question!
The Charger is NOT very quick in stock trim, so it won't take very much to out run him. 4.10 gears is a great start! Decent tires will help to get it moving from a stand still. A small shot on nitrous (50hp) would be more than enough to easily walk all over the Charger. You don't need the same amount of power since you have FAR LESS weight.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:18 AM.