4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

Huge Change.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 1, 2011 | 09:11 PM
  #1  
BrideGt's Avatar
BrideGt
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 7
From: Illinois
Default Huge Change.

What's up guys. So this is a big big change for me. I grew up on the whole JDM scene with 4cylinder cars. I've had a Eclipse Gsx, and a Lancer Gts both Mitsu's..Under my skin i've been dying for a muscle car. Preferably a Mustang. I battled in my head for months between Camaros, Mustangs, GTO's and so on. I have made my decision obviously, thats's why I'm here. I will pick up one of these mustangs for sure within a couple weeks as soon as I make my mind up. I am really leaning on the 2000 Gt. First mission is jdm bride racing seats. I know "jdm" in an american car… It will all come together as soon as I make a build thread. Check these stangs out and any tips will be appreciated.












This is the 2000 GT Vert
http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.js...e&rdpage=thumb




1997 Gt Supercharged
http://www.autotrader.com/fyc/vdp.js...e&rdpage=thumb
Old Oct 1, 2011 | 10:17 PM
  #2  
Soldier GT's Avatar
Soldier GT
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,688
From: MO/ Born and raised in Louisiana
Default

At 1st I was thinking New Edge all the way but that 97 looks clean.. I would probably pick the 97 GT...

Last edited by Soldier GT; Oct 1, 2011 at 10:24 PM.
Old Oct 2, 2011 | 01:00 AM
  #3  
IEGT1015's Avatar
IEGT1015
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 601
From: Chicago, IL
Default

meh to either of those, I'd keep looking. where are you in illinois?
Old Oct 2, 2011 | 10:46 AM
  #4  
BrideGt's Avatar
BrideGt
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 7
From: Illinois
Default

Springfield.
Old Oct 2, 2011 | 11:55 AM
  #5  
CobraFrenzy's Avatar
CobraFrenzy
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 791
From: PA
Default

97 def looks sharp .. Althogh know pic of the engine bay would concern me
Old Oct 2, 2011 | 11:56 AM
  #6  
99 GT vert's Avatar
99 GT vert
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,760
From: Northwest Ohio (Fort Wayne Area)
Default

the 97 says it is supercharged but no were did i see what type of blower or see a pic i would be leery of that one
Old Oct 2, 2011 | 12:14 PM
  #7  
MCxQubed's Avatar
MCxQubed
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,173
From: New Jersey
Default

^ exactly what i was thinking
Old Oct 2, 2011 | 12:17 PM
  #8  
scooter3's Avatar
scooter3
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,147
From: Arizona
Default

First off welcome to the dark side.

They both look clean. I am not a vert fan, but it looks nice. It has a few more miles then the 97 relative to years. The 97 also looks good, but no pic of the engine and it looks like the battery has been relocated. If is indeed been SC you never know if the previous owner beat the crap out of it. I would start with a fresh base and do my own thing. You never know what someone has done to a modified car.
Old Oct 2, 2011 | 05:08 PM
  #9  
BrideGt's Avatar
BrideGt
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 7
From: Illinois
Default

Originally Posted by scooter3

The 97 also looks good, but no pic of the engine and it looks like the battery has been relocated. If is indeed been SC you never know if the previous owner beat the crap out of it. I would start with a fresh base and do my own thing. You never know what someone has done to a modified car.
Exactly what I was thinking. Thats why I am leaning more towards the 2000 GT Plus. I dont know if the PI Headswap was done, or if they just threw a SC on it. Either way you are limited without the swap because of bad air flow, The 2000 doesnt have that problem, I think I might want to start out fresh.
Old Oct 2, 2011 | 10:19 PM
  #10  
Blown_n_Stroked's Avatar
Blown_n_Stroked
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 6
From: South Carolina
Default

I agree with the "meh" to both. I guess it really depends on what you plan to do with the car. I would pass on the 00 due to the vert top. There could be leaks and bad seals that could drive you bonkers. My previous vert was fun for about 2 months, then i got out of the whole drop top style and left it up all the time. As for the 97, i would stay away from this one completely. As stated earlier, you have no clue what has been done to it and how bad it was abused. You also don't know if the bottom end has been built or if its even tuned right. It's also an automatic...... In my opinion thats an automatic no unless you prefer and auto. Then again with it being blown the previous owner probably dogged it and the auto trans could be wore out also which would be more money you would initially have to put into it.

So in my opinion i would continue my search. But, if you prefer one or the other i would go with the 2000.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:29 PM.