4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

PI swap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-18-2012, 09:14 AM
  #11  
kugzgt
5th Gear Member
 
kugzgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 2,472
Default

I dynoed mine at 293/292 with pi swap, cams, and lts.
kugzgt is offline  
Old 01-18-2012, 09:45 AM
  #12  
Rockwell28
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Rockwell28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 1,452
Default

Originally Posted by kugzgt
I dynoed mine at 293/292 with pi swap, cams, and lts.
So with the full pi swap and longtubes you put down 293/292?


Lizzy when you put down 245rwhp was it a full pi swap? bc thats a 48rwhp difference in a similar setup minus the longtubes if it was a full pi swap
Rockwell28 is offline  
Old 01-18-2012, 09:53 AM
  #13  
lizzyfan
Underboss
 
lizzyfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Helaware
Posts: 20,273
Default

Originally Posted by Rockwell28
So with the full pi swap and longtubes you put down 293/292?


Lizzy when you put down 245rwhp was it a full pi swap? bc thats a 48rwhp difference in a similar setup minus the longtubes if it was a full pi swap
Just a full PI swap, no aftetmarket came or headers
lizzyfan is offline  
Old 01-18-2012, 09:54 AM
  #14  
lizzyfan
Underboss
 
lizzyfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Helaware
Posts: 20,273
Default

Cams. Lol
lizzyfan is offline  
Old 01-18-2012, 09:59 AM
  #15  
uberstang1
Chupacabra
 
uberstang1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: wilkes-barre PA
Posts: 9,621
Default

Originally Posted by Rockwell28
So with the full pi swap and longtubes you put down 293/292?


Lizzy when you put down 245rwhp was it a full pi swap? bc thats a 48rwhp difference in a similar setup minus the longtubes if it was a full pi swap

Kugzy made those numbers with long tubes pi swap plus aftermarket cams. Mhs stage 2s i beleive.
uberstang1 is offline  
Old 01-18-2012, 11:02 AM
  #16  
Rockwell28
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Rockwell28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 1,452
Default

Oh ok I gotcha thanks for th responses on that.
Rockwell28 is offline  
Old 01-18-2012, 02:48 PM
  #17  
kugzgt
5th Gear Member
 
kugzgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 2,472
Default

yes sir. if i were to do it over i would have gone blown pushrod. im not a huge fan of 2v and how it makes power.
kugzgt is offline  
Old 01-18-2012, 04:30 PM
  #18  
Rockwell28
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Rockwell28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 1,452
Default

Originally Posted by kugzgt
yes sir. if i were to do it over i would have gone blown pushrod. im not a huge fan of 2v and how it makes power.
I though ohc motors respond better to boost vs pushrod motors?
Rockwell28 is offline  
Old 01-18-2012, 06:41 PM
  #19  
sn95_331_GT_ yellow
5th Gear Member
 
sn95_331_GT_ yellow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: CT
Posts: 2,394
Default

Originally Posted by Rockwell28
I though ohc motors respond better to boost vs pushrod motors?
yes they do, but i can build a 363 CID pushrod motor that happily sips 93 and makes 450rwhp without even thinking about it... id actually have to try not to...
sn95_331_GT_ yellow is offline  
Old 01-18-2012, 06:44 PM
  #20  
kugzgt
5th Gear Member
 
kugzgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 2,472
Default

i just like the way that pushrods are so much cheaper to build vs. modular motors
kugzgt is offline  


Quick Reply: PI swap



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:22 AM.