4.6L General Discussion This section is for non-tech specific information pertaining to 4.6L (Modular) Mustangs built from 1996 to 2004.

Best intake manifold? (Trickflow Streetburner?)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-20-2012, 07:32 PM
  #11  
lizzyfan
Underboss
 
lizzyfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Helaware
Posts: 20,273
Default

New MM&FF has a review of the streetburner
lizzyfan is offline  
Old 11-20-2012, 09:38 PM
  #12  
69MustangCoupe393cid
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
69MustangCoupe393cid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,229
Default

Originally Posted by lizzyfan
New MM&FF has a review of the streetburner
Anyone have this article?
69MustangCoupe393cid is offline  
Old 11-25-2012, 06:35 PM
  #13  
69MustangCoupe393cid
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
69MustangCoupe393cid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,229
Default

Found it.

http://www.musclemustangfastfords.co...linder_terror/

Looks like the intake is well worth it on a track car that sees higher RPM. But with the power loss down low it's probably better for a street car to just run a good upper and keep the PI lower manifold.
69MustangCoupe393cid is offline  
Old 11-25-2012, 06:41 PM
  #14  
jtb727
3rd Gear Member
 
jtb727's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: AZ
Posts: 589
Default

the one in the magtested it on a road race car.

Last edited by jtb727; 11-25-2012 at 06:45 PM.
jtb727 is offline  
Old 11-25-2012, 09:22 PM
  #15  
69MustangCoupe393cid
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
69MustangCoupe393cid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,229
Default

Originally Posted by jtb727
the one in the magtested it on a road race car.
You think the results on my car would be a lot different? It obviously picks up a lot on the top end, but I don't rev my car past 6300 usually. I usually shift around 6k or so in fear of blowing something up.
69MustangCoupe393cid is offline  
Old 11-26-2012, 12:29 PM
  #16  
Gregg@TFS
 
Gregg@TFS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Ohio
Posts: 11
Default

For your average street car not being turned above 7000 RPM the Street intake would be the way to go, and maintain better low and mid range torque compared to the trach heat.
Gregg@TFS is offline  
Old 11-27-2012, 09:12 PM
  #17  
69MustangCoupe393cid
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
69MustangCoupe393cid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,229
Default

Originally Posted by Gregg@TFS
For your average street car not being turned above 7000 RPM the Street intake would be the way to go, and maintain better low and mid range torque compared to the trach heat.
I'm just wondering how much of a gain it is over the stock lower PI intake if you have a nice accufab upper and tb.
69MustangCoupe393cid is offline  
Old 11-28-2012, 05:21 PM
  #18  
03greyGT
3rd Gear Member
 
03greyGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Akron, OH
Posts: 835
Default

The dyno graph on the MM&FF article is really the only comparison that ive seen the street burner vs. stock PI intake. Every other test that Ive seen is vs the Edelbrock or the Track Heat. It looks like down low in the rpms the Street Burner is right with the PI, the curves are right next to eachother, and mid range the Street Burner gains a few hp, then in the high rpms the Street Burner pulls about 18 peak hp over the PI, and thats on a blower car. It would probably be lower on an N/A car IMO. Id just be really nervous to spend $900 plus money for a tune to get 3-4 hp on my N/A setup. Ive been down that road before with another aftermarket intake manifold, so Im leary to dump another $1,000+ just to experiment...
03greyGT is offline  
Old 11-28-2012, 09:40 PM
  #19  
69MustangCoupe393cid
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
69MustangCoupe393cid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,229
Default

Originally Posted by 03greyGT
The dyno graph on the MM&FF article is really the only comparison that ive seen the street burner vs. stock PI intake. Every other test that Ive seen is vs the Edelbrock or the Track Heat. It looks like down low in the rpms the Street Burner is right with the PI, the curves are right next to eachother, and mid range the Street Burner gains a few hp, then in the high rpms the Street Burner pulls about 18 peak hp over the PI, and thats on a blower car. It would probably be lower on an N/A car IMO. Id just be really nervous to spend $900 plus money for a tune to get 3-4 hp on my N/A setup. Ive been down that road before with another aftermarket intake manifold, so Im leary to dump another $1,000+ just to experiment...
Yeah cost is a factor but for what I'm doing it doesn't matter. I'm wondering if the accufab upper with stock PI really loses that much power over that intake. Because that comparison is vs, stock and we all know the stock upper really sucks.
69MustangCoupe393cid is offline  
Old 12-02-2012, 04:23 PM
  #20  
teej281
4.6L Section Moderator
 
teej281's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Central PA
Posts: 10,286
Default

I would leave the stock PI manifold until you can afford a built shortblock. Any aftermarket intake manifold will shoot your powerband way higher than the stock shortblock will like.
teej281 is offline  


Quick Reply: Best intake manifold? (Trickflow Streetburner?)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:20 PM.