5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

5.0 s/c vs. 427 stroker

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2006, 05:56 PM
  #11  
Tims 88GT
6th Gear Member
 
Tims 88GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 7,657
Default RE: 5.0 s/c vs. 427 stroker

not that fast, thats like 100+ words a min
Tims 88GT is offline  
Old 03-24-2006, 05:59 PM
  #12  
randy78045
6th Gear Member
 
randy78045's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Laredo, TEXAS
Posts: 6,054
Default RE: 5.0 s/c vs. 427 stroker

So anyway, since were talking strokers, I personally wouldnt go over a 408 for a daily driver. I wonder what a s/c would be like on my car??? Like ahhh, money is no problem.. [X(]
randy78045 is offline  
Old 03-24-2006, 06:00 PM
  #13  
Tims 88GT
6th Gear Member
 
Tims 88GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location:
Posts: 7,657
Default RE: 5.0 s/c vs. 427 stroker

^^ it would scream
Tims 88GT is offline  
Old 03-24-2006, 06:10 PM
  #14  
r.barn
6th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
r.barn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 5,263
Default RE: 5.0 s/c vs. 427 stroker

any problems passing emmissions test on a 408 carbed engine?

or have to go with EFI to pass new emmission standards?
r.barn is offline  
Old 03-24-2006, 06:16 PM
  #15  
randy78045
6th Gear Member
 
randy78045's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Laredo, TEXAS
Posts: 6,054
Default RE: 5.0 s/c vs. 427 stroker


ORIGINAL: r.barn

any problems passing emmissions test on a 408 carbed engine?

or have to go with EFI to pass new emmission standards?
EMISSIONS????????? OH GOD FORGIVE ME FOR I HAVE NO EMISSION STUFF ON MY CAR... [sm=hail.gif]
We dont have emission testing here....
randy78045 is offline  
Old 03-24-2006, 06:18 PM
  #16  
randy78045
6th Gear Member
 
randy78045's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Laredo, TEXAS
Posts: 6,054
Default RE: 5.0 s/c vs. 427 stroker

Ooops, forgot who was messaging me...
randy78045 is offline  
Old 03-24-2006, 06:19 PM
  #17  
88BlueGT
6th Gear Member
 
88BlueGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 15,042
Default RE: 5.0 s/c vs. 427 stroker

^^ You are VERY lucky. BTW, Randy... whats your setup? MPG? Top Speed? Gear Ratio? 5spd? Auto? Stall?
88BlueGT is offline  
Old 03-24-2006, 06:24 PM
  #18  
randy78045
6th Gear Member
 
randy78045's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Laredo, TEXAS
Posts: 6,054
Default RE: 5.0 s/c vs. 427 stroker


ORIGINAL: 88BlueGT

^^ You are VERY lucky. BTW, Randy... whats your setup? MPG? Top Speed? Gear Ratio? 5spd? Auto? Stall?
MPG... Dont know... The car drinks more than I do... and thats a lot... Top Speed, dont know... The speedo until recently only went to 80... I since changed it but havent seen if I could pass that 140 mark... I need my license... [X(] 3:70 rear, stock 5 sp for a little while more... ET Streets on the rear...
randy78045 is offline  
Old 03-24-2006, 06:25 PM
  #19  
88BlueGT
6th Gear Member
 
88BlueGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 15,042
Default RE: 5.0 s/c vs. 427 stroker

Are you running 205's?
88BlueGT is offline  
Old 03-24-2006, 06:29 PM
  #20  
randy78045
6th Gear Member
 
randy78045's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Laredo, TEXAS
Posts: 6,054
Default RE: 5.0 s/c vs. 427 stroker


ORIGINAL: 88BlueGT

Are you running 205's?
Yeah... you made me have to look that one up...
randy78045 is offline  


Quick Reply: 5.0 s/c vs. 427 stroker



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:22 AM.