w8less

whats better c&l or pro-m

w8less

anyone?

PRO50SC

It's a matter of opinion. Some like one, some like the other. Kinda like Ford vs. Chebby!

w8less

well i called jdsperformance and were having trouble cause i wanted to get the c&l but since i have a 95 i have to have the flange and he said that c&l has stopped making them with the flange so i might have to get the pro-m but i was pretty much set on the c&l. although there calling c&l right now to see what can be done

turbostang21

i try not to spread info i can't prove to be factual....but i was told pro m is more accurate

gspfunk

^^^I've heard the same thing, but I believe that is refering to the Pro-M Univer. It takes air samples from all the way around the housing (360*).

I have the PMAS [was Pro-M] 75mm [from JD's Performance]. I haven't used it yet as I'm currently rebuilding my car. C&L was my next choice, though. The advantage to C&L is that when you swap inj's, you pay $30 for a new sample tube as opposed to $100 to have your MAF recalibrated if it's pro-m or granetelli.

PRO50SC

I had a pro-m originally, It didn't work for shyt so i sent it back. I run a C&L 76 mm w/ no issues. But depending on who you talk to, you'll hear the same thing but the opposite between the two.

Like I said, they are hit and miss.

Tims 88GT

if you can get an older pro-m get it, but if not get a new c&l