95 GT Auto Stock RWHP
05-19-2006, 07:21 PM
#5
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 614
RE: 95 GT Auto Stock RWHP
ORIGINAL: blackmustang94gt
that sucks...but for some reason i always smoke the fox bodies!? what is it with that? not the cobra's though... fox cobras are 245 if im not mistaken...
that sucks...but for some reason i always smoke the fox bodies!? what is it with that? not the cobra's though... fox cobras are 245 if im not mistaken...
05-19-2006, 07:33 PM
#6
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 5,263
RE: 95 GT Auto Stock RWHP
It actaully depends on the year.
they started out under 200 and ended up by '87, i think it was, with 225hp at the crank.
all stangs after that (except cobras) had 225hp at the crank and about 190rwhp thru 1995, in 1996 the 4.6L came out.
and it only had like 240 when it first came out.
they started out under 200 and ended up by '87, i think it was, with 225hp at the crank.
all stangs after that (except cobras) had 225hp at the crank and about 190rwhp thru 1995, in 1996 the 4.6L came out.
and it only had like 240 when it first came out.
ORIGINAL: cepowers18
I agree with 225 on the 94-95, but I thought Fox's were 215 stock (at the crank)
ORIGINAL: blackmustang94gt
that sucks...but for some reason i always smoke the fox bodies!? what is it with that? not the cobra's though... fox cobras are 245 if im not mistaken...
that sucks...but for some reason i always smoke the fox bodies!? what is it with that? not the cobra's though... fox cobras are 245 if im not mistaken...
05-20-2006, 08:22 AM
#9
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 88
RE: 95 GT Auto Stock RWHP
i would hope less than 190! [sm=insomnia.gif] when my 91 aod 5.0 had a b&m intake, msd ignition, timing bumped up to 12 degrees and flow master cat-backs mine put down around 188. 
. unless the 94 and 95s has less drivetrain loss than foxes my year? as for hp differences from the 87-93 and the 94-95 5.0s i think it was only the 93s that were lowered to 215hp right? other than that they were rated at 225?
. unless the 94 and 95s has less drivetrain loss than foxes my year? as for hp differences from the 87-93 and the 94-95 5.0s i think it was only the 93s that were lowered to 215hp right? other than that they were rated at 225?