putting a 460 into a 91 notch
06-14-2006, 06:43 PM
#22
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: THE AlbuCrackie,NM
Posts: 843
RE: putting a 460 into a 91 notch
ORIGINAL: lookinforastang
big blocks are more weight
chevelle SS 454 ran what high 12s/13s?
u could get a 302 in the 12s with a head swap
i dont think shifter wants to accept that technology is out performing the old. its cool hes into big blocks but he is overly bias with his opinions..
u get more torque out of the box with a big block dosnt mean a small block cant catch up though.
big blocks are more weight
chevelle SS 454 ran what high 12s/13s?
u could get a 302 in the 12s with a head swap
i dont think shifter wants to accept that technology is out performing the old. its cool hes into big blocks but he is overly bias with his opinions..
u get more torque out of the box with a big block dosnt mean a small block cant catch up though.
But comparing a 454 Chevelle to a Fox body is like comparing Calista Flockhart to Oprah Winfrey. They are just way too different in weight to even think about honestly comparing in any aspect of life.
But yes, you are right with the Technology statement.
-Ivan
06-14-2006, 06:44 PM
#23
I ♥ Acer
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,364
RE: putting a 460 into a 91 notch
ORIGINAL: lookinforastang
already has..
show me a big block 500+ hp daily driver capable of 20 MPG and low 12 second passes
already has..
show me a big block 500+ hp daily driver capable of 20 MPG and low 12 second passes
06-14-2006, 06:46 PM
#26
I ♥ Acer
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,364
RE: putting a 460 into a 91 notch
ORIGINAL: Bad Karma
I agree with everything you said...
But comparing a 454 Chevelle to a Fox body is like comparing Calista Flockhart to Oprah Winfrey. They are just way too different in weight to even think about honestly comparing in any aspect of life.
But yes, you are right with the Technology statement.
-Ivan
ORIGINAL: lookinforastang
big blocks are more weight
chevelle SS 454 ran what high 12s/13s?
u could get a 302 in the 12s with a head swap
i dont think shifter wants to accept that technology is out performing the old. its cool hes into big blocks but he is overly bias with his opinions..
u get more torque out of the box with a big block dosnt mean a small block cant catch up though.
big blocks are more weight
chevelle SS 454 ran what high 12s/13s?
u could get a 302 in the 12s with a head swap
i dont think shifter wants to accept that technology is out performing the old. its cool hes into big blocks but he is overly bias with his opinions..
u get more torque out of the box with a big block dosnt mean a small block cant catch up though.
But comparing a 454 Chevelle to a Fox body is like comparing Calista Flockhart to Oprah Winfrey. They are just way too different in weight to even think about honestly comparing in any aspect of life.
But yes, you are right with the Technology statement.
-Ivan
06-14-2006, 06:49 PM
#27
I ♥ Acer
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,039
RE: putting a 460 into a 91 notch
shifter im not doubting your knowledge infact ive learned quite a lot just from reading ur posts but ive also caught on that u are a big block fan and tend to try to "convince" people they are superior to anything out there.
i'd still like to see u answer my question with a source or link backing up your claim. ya this is the internet but with all cars the driver mod is most important.
i'd still like to see u answer my question with a source or link backing up your claim. ya this is the internet but with all cars the driver mod is most important.
06-14-2006, 06:50 PM
#28
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 89
RE: putting a 460 into a 91 notch
theres no replacement for displacement simply put, if you have problems on your big block build its your own fault
my dad had a 460 in his foxbody, very reliable also
now this is obviously retarded comparison but ;D les see your 302 beat this mega block 1,556,002 cubic inch diesel!!
http://www.bath.ac.uk/~ccsshb/12cyl/ i just like showing that page off heh
my dad had a 460 in his foxbody, very reliable also
now this is obviously retarded comparison but ;D les see your 302 beat this mega block 1,556,002 cubic inch diesel!!
http://www.bath.ac.uk/~ccsshb/12cyl/ i just like showing that page off heh
06-14-2006, 06:50 PM
#29
I ♥ Acer
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,364
RE: putting a 460 into a 91 notch
ORIGINAL: lookinforastang
shifter im not doubting your knowledge infact ive learned quite a lot just from reading ur posts but ive also caught on that u are a big block fan and tend to try to "convince" people they are superior to anything out there.
i'd still like to see u answer my question with a source or link backing up your claim. ya this is the internet but with all cars the driver mod is most important.
shifter im not doubting your knowledge infact ive learned quite a lot just from reading ur posts but ive also caught on that u are a big block fan and tend to try to "convince" people they are superior to anything out there.
i'd still like to see u answer my question with a source or link backing up your claim. ya this is the internet but with all cars the driver mod is most important.
06-14-2006, 06:52 PM
#30
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hamilton, NJ
Posts: 15,042
RE: putting a 460 into a 91 notch
ORIGINAL: klapdout
theres no replacement for displacement simply put, if you have problems on your big block build its your own fault
my dad had a 460 in his foxbody, very reliable also
now this is obviously retarded comparison but ;D les see your 302 beat this mega block 1,556,002 cubic inch diesel!!
http://www.bath.ac.uk/~ccsshb/12cyl/ i just like showing that page off heh
theres no replacement for displacement simply put, if you have problems on your big block build its your own fault
my dad had a 460 in his foxbody, very reliable also
now this is obviously retarded comparison but ;D les see your 302 beat this mega block 1,556,002 cubic inch diesel!!
http://www.bath.ac.uk/~ccsshb/12cyl/ i just like showing that page off heh