MustangForums.com

MustangForums.com (https://mustangforums.com/forum/index.php)
-   5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang (https://mustangforums.com/forum/5-0l-1979-1995-mustang-14/)
-   -   how much HP? (https://mustangforums.com/forum/5-0l-1979-1995-mustang/140753-how-much-hp.html)

pastor_ice43 06-17-2006 06:17 PM

how much HP?
 
how much horsepopwer does a 1995 Mustang GT come stock with?

ckyguy68 06-17-2006 06:22 PM

RE: how much HP?
 
225 @ crank and 190-200 @ wheels, depending on auto or 5 spd.

94RoadRacerGT 06-17-2006 06:41 PM

RE: how much HP?
 
Hmm 94s also? I read some where that my 94 had 215. What do you guys think?

91lxstang 06-17-2006 06:43 PM

RE: how much HP?
 
i think its just a change in how they calculated hp so its basically the same

SpooledupRacing 06-17-2006 06:53 PM

RE: how much HP?
 
how much hp's on a stock 87 5.0 HO with a 5spd

91lxstang 06-17-2006 06:55 PM

RE: how much HP?
 
225 hp, 300 tq

ckyguy68 06-17-2006 06:55 PM

RE: how much HP?
 
same. 87-95 were pretty much the same engine except 93s had hyperutectic pistons.


ORIGINAL: SpooledupRacing

how much hp's on a stock 87 5.0 HO with a 5spd

93foxgt 06-17-2006 07:05 PM

RE: how much HP?
 
I actually think everything after 92 (starting w/93) had hypereutectic pistons. They're supposed to be more oil-efficient. w/o costing HP.

87-95 were basically the same engine with the only REAL difference in HP coming from changing the speed density system to mass air, which gave the 5.0l engine a little less air to breathe due to more drag and a worse flow rate on the intake side, but that only cost about 1-2hp. The reason '93 is rated @ 205hp and 94-95 is rated @ 215hp is because of the different method of measuring crank HP. Besides that, they all had the same HP with that 1-2 speed density difference.


At least that's what I read hehe.

r.barn 06-17-2006 07:22 PM

RE: how much HP?
 
hypert. pistons have tighter fit than forged since they dont expand and contract as much as forged. thats why less oil consumption



ORIGINAL: 93foxgt

I actually think everything after 92 (starting w/93) had hypereutectic pistons. They're supposed to be more oil-efficient. w/o costing HP.

87-95 were basically the same engine with the only REAL difference in HP coming from changing the speed density system to mass air, which gave the 5.0l engine a little less air to breathe due to more drag and a worse flow rate on the intake side, but that only cost about 1-2hp. The reason '93 is rated @ 205hp and 94-95 is rated @ 215hp is because of the different method of measuring crank HP. Besides that, they all had the same HP with that 1-2 speed density difference.


At least that's what I read hehe.

pastor_ice43 06-17-2006 07:32 PM

RE: how much HP?
 
thanks for the help. I was thinking of trading my 05 v6 for a 95 gt, but never mind.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:09 AM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands