...from '4.10 gears post'...hmmmm !!!
#1
...from '4.10 gears post'...hmmmm !!!
First off.... THANKS PX429!!!! I asked the question about gear awhile back. Anyhow, using the link PX provided .. I ran the numbers.
The reason for my original post (awhile back) was that it seemed like I was running out of RPM's very quickly in the lower gears (more than I remembered from my 82,83,84,85 and 87). I also thought my speedo was off (reading too low). Anyhow (other then me thinking my speedo was reading too low...which would be just the opposite according to an earlier response). I think my '86 has either 3.73's or 3.90's in the rear.
I did the math (and tested it while driving) for both 4th (1:1) and 5th (.65:1?). Both come out somewhere between 3.73 and 3.90. I guess I can take 'gears' OFF my list of 'things to do'. Apparently they are already there from the previous (or previous/previous) owner.
Like I said, I thought it was 'quick' off the line. Not I don't know weather to be disappointed that I can't see (feel) the difference or be happy that I don't need to spend the $$$ to get them changed!
Anyhow, this add's to my (in my opinion) 'bargain' car I got for $1700!
PS..... Now I can't even run a post here saying 'I got my gears in!' LOL.
Thanks guys for a great forum! Even when you don't think you'll learn something....you do!!!!!!! ;-)
The reason for my original post (awhile back) was that it seemed like I was running out of RPM's very quickly in the lower gears (more than I remembered from my 82,83,84,85 and 87). I also thought my speedo was off (reading too low). Anyhow (other then me thinking my speedo was reading too low...which would be just the opposite according to an earlier response). I think my '86 has either 3.73's or 3.90's in the rear.
I did the math (and tested it while driving) for both 4th (1:1) and 5th (.65:1?). Both come out somewhere between 3.73 and 3.90. I guess I can take 'gears' OFF my list of 'things to do'. Apparently they are already there from the previous (or previous/previous) owner.
Like I said, I thought it was 'quick' off the line. Not I don't know weather to be disappointed that I can't see (feel) the difference or be happy that I don't need to spend the $$$ to get them changed!
Anyhow, this add's to my (in my opinion) 'bargain' car I got for $1700!
PS..... Now I can't even run a post here saying 'I got my gears in!' LOL.
Thanks guys for a great forum! Even when you don't think you'll learn something....you do!!!!!!! ;-)
#3
RE: ...from '4.10 gears post'...hmmmm !!!
Calculator
According the the numbers I plugged (for your setup). 60MPH, 2.43 gear ratio (read the instructions .65 (5th?) x 3.73), and a 26" tire diameter (I guessed at this for you). You should be at around 1900 RPM (if you DO have 3.73 gears).
Thanks again to PX419...
According the the numbers I plugged (for your setup). 60MPH, 2.43 gear ratio (read the instructions .65 (5th?) x 3.73), and a 26" tire diameter (I guessed at this for you). You should be at around 1900 RPM (if you DO have 3.73 gears).
Thanks again to PX419...
#6
RE: ...from '4.10 gears post'...hmmmm !!!
I doubt that OD is .068. .68 maybe ( I may have been wrong to use .65). Anyhow, do the math. .68 x 3.73 = 2.54. According the the calculator, this is how you figure 5th plus your rear gear.
(If you have a .068 5th, I get you get GREAT gas mileage!!!!) There again, maybe I'm reading something completely wrong...(which wouldn't be a surprise!)
Anyhow, with the new numbers( my mistake) Goose should be close to 2k rpm at 60, in 5th, with 3.73 gears.
Just my 2cents
tcwc
(If you have a .068 5th, I get you get GREAT gas mileage!!!!) There again, maybe I'm reading something completely wrong...(which wouldn't be a surprise!)
Anyhow, with the new numbers( my mistake) Goose should be close to 2k rpm at 60, in 5th, with 3.73 gears.
Just my 2cents
tcwc
#8
RE: ...from '4.10 gears post'...hmmmm !!!
I might have gotten myself into a pickle here.....
But If you check out the 'Calculator', it should take into account all MPH (assuming the calc itself is right).
I found a simular formula (I broke it down by doing the math) from Edelbrock and the numbers matched the above listed calculator (posted by PX429). So I assume it's accurate.
Anyhow, I assume someone (during the life of my car put 3.73's or 3.90's in it). I'm happy !!!!!!!!! ;-)
But If you check out the 'Calculator', it should take into account all MPH (assuming the calc itself is right).
I found a simular formula (I broke it down by doing the math) from Edelbrock and the numbers matched the above listed calculator (posted by PX429). So I assume it's accurate.
Anyhow, I assume someone (during the life of my car put 3.73's or 3.90's in it). I'm happy !!!!!!!!! ;-)