hey don't smack tuffy for his good numbers....something in his combo worked better that's all....


i do know my tko is zapping hp like i had an auto....

 

I dont think anyone here is doubting him because I believe his numbers but I just think there must be some information not being let out to achieve these numbers lol hah

 

true i agree as well.....maybe his g/f was blowing into his cai??????...hell that's probably 100hp right there........

 

got the sheet yet?

 

Yeah, I'm thinking the same thing. Not w/ just h/c/i!!!

 

It's not the rwhp that's raising the alarm; i got 323rwhp & with the stock shortblock; but not drag strip optimzed....
It's the crazy rear wheel torque numbers that have me scratching my bald head......

 

ok tuffy what did i tell ya to do...casue apparently it worked.

 

The dyno was probably incorrectly calibrated, with h/c/i most guys make 60 less hp and alot less tq. Sounds like numbers coming from a car with forced induction.

 

outside of the cam...i'd say you're right...but iv'e seen some 306's hit 370 rwhp...hell just look up anderson motorsports

 

You Definatly DID NOT make that much RWHP on a mustang dyno. For starters its a mustang dyno not a dynojet. Mustang dyno's use aerodynamics as a factor for the horsepower your making at the wheels. Typicaly people make 30-40 RWHP less than they would on a dynojet.

I made 325 RWHP and 330 RWTQ at 6300 RPMs with heads that have huge 247cc intake runners compared to your 165's, A GT40 intake which is a little restrictive compared to your Track-Heat, and a Z303 cam that has 228/228 duration at 0.050 and 583/583 lift with 1.7 RR's compared to your cam that has 220/220 duration at 0.050 and 498/498 lift. I also was running 11.2.1 Compression with 110 VP race fuel and 10* base timing.

Since then Ive switched to a Trickflow R-Series Intake and a Lunati cam that has 242/252 duration at 0.050 and 560/576 lift.
The car feels like its close to 350 RWHP

Theres no way you made that kind of power on a "MUSTANG" dyno with those parts.