wtf cobalt ss?
10-03-2006, 12:53 PM
#11
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Frederick, Maryland.
Posts: 2,118
RE: wtf cobalt ss?
ORIGINAL: Slo5oh
good thing theres not an aftermarket for em yet
good thing theres not an aftermarket for em yet
Intense Store - GM 2.0L Ecotec LSJ
10-03-2006, 03:37 PM
#14
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 329
RE: wtf cobalt ss?
I have a feeling when its time to trade in the truck, I might pick up one of the ss's. Anything thats made nowadays that runs under 15's with all the EPA sh*t they need to have is alright by me. Not to mention that you can run 14.3 with a warranty.
10-03-2006, 05:16 PM
#15
4th Gear Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 1,677
RE: wtf cobalt ss?
ORIGINAL: 88BlueGT
Yea, that arent slow. I have a basically stock AOD so I wouldnt even mess with em lol I got my a$$ handed to me by an SRT-4 the other night too [:@]
I need a supercharger sooooooooo bad! [8D]
Yea, that arent slow. I have a basically stock AOD so I wouldnt even mess with em lol I got my a$$ handed to me by an SRT-4 the other night too [:@]
I need a supercharger sooooooooo bad! [8D]
TURBO TURBO TURBO!!!!!
10-03-2006, 11:41 PM
#16
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location:
Posts: 8
RE: wtf cobalt ss?
they are too heavy for those little engines in my opinion, they're bulky i think, aren't they over 2800lbs? i hear their weight distribution is rubbish
"At nearly 3,000 pounds the Chevrolet Cobalt SS isn't light either, and it feels heavy on the road. Plus its acceleration is tempered by those big, heavy (25 pounds each) wheels." -edmunds
"At nearly 3,000 pounds the Chevrolet Cobalt SS isn't light either, and it feels heavy on the road. Plus its acceleration is tempered by those big, heavy (25 pounds each) wheels." -edmunds
10-10-2006, 07:54 PM
#17
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 2,103
RE: wtf cobalt ss?
Nice name! 
ORIGINAL: fanofablacknotch
they are too heavy for those little engines in my opinion, they're bulky i think, aren't they over 2800lbs? i hear their weight distribution is rubbish
"At nearly 3,000 pounds the Chevrolet Cobalt SS isn't light either, and it feels heavy on the road. Plus its acceleration is tempered by those big, heavy (25 pounds each) wheels." -edmunds
they are too heavy for those little engines in my opinion, they're bulky i think, aren't they over 2800lbs? i hear their weight distribution is rubbish
"At nearly 3,000 pounds the Chevrolet Cobalt SS isn't light either, and it feels heavy on the road. Plus its acceleration is tempered by those big, heavy (25 pounds each) wheels." -edmunds
10-10-2006, 08:00 PM
#18
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 699
RE: wtf cobalt ss?
They are quick. I have driven one before.
But the thing is unless they get you from a rolling punch there is no way they can keep traction. Front wheel drive is going to kill them.
If they mod it...then they will just roast the tires longer than they do now.
So if you race one...always go from a dead stop.
But the thing is unless they get you from a rolling punch there is no way they can keep traction. Front wheel drive is going to kill them.
If they mod it...then they will just roast the tires longer than they do now.
So if you race one...always go from a dead stop.
10-10-2006, 08:01 PM
#19
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Severn, Md
Posts: 2,298
RE: wtf cobalt ss?
I raced one a while back, he had an intake, exhaust, and some other stuff. From a 3rd gear roll, he got a jump, i started pulling, and just as i got next to him, we were both about to grab 4th, i heard his car knock, and it threw a rod.
I guess the factory fuel pump isnt really sufficient for a modded car.
I guess the factory fuel pump isnt really sufficient for a modded car.
10-10-2006, 08:26 PM
#20
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 80
RE: wtf cobalt ss?
my friend has one of those we raced from a dig i kind of had a bad start but after i got traction he got ate up bad,then i drove it and it seemed like after 1st and 2nd they are turds[sm=lame.gif]