5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

My stang. Check it out.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-2006, 03:54 PM
  #11  
5IVE.OH
3rd Gear Member
 
5IVE.OH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 907
Default RE: My stang. Check it out.

That year mustang should be lumped into the same catagory as the 74-78 mustang II's. The GTO is a bloated cavalier. Nice hood BTW.
5IVE.OH is offline  
Old 10-14-2006, 03:57 PM
  #12  
OnyxCobra
6th Gear Member
 
OnyxCobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 8,467
Default RE: My stang. Check it out.

ORIGINAL: 5IVE.OH

That year mustang should be lumped into the same catagory as the 74-78 mustang II's
. The GTO is a bloated cavalier. Nice hood BTW.
why would you say that?
OnyxCobra is offline  
Old 10-14-2006, 03:58 PM
  #13  
4fit?
4th Gear Member
 
4fit?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Graham, NC
Posts: 1,472
Default RE: My stang. Check it out.

Nice. I would lose the headlight covers personally, but it's still a sweet ride. Hood kicks ****!!
4fit? is offline  
Old 10-14-2006, 04:01 PM
  #14  
5IVE.OH
3rd Gear Member
 
5IVE.OH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 907
Default RE: My stang. Check it out.


ORIGINAL: OnyxCobra

ORIGINAL: 5IVE.OH

That year mustang should be lumped into the same catagory as the 74-78 mustang II's
. The GTO is a bloated cavalier. Nice hood BTW.
why would you say that?
They are ugly. They look the same as the mustang II's just a bit more longer. Same gross non functioning side scoops, long nose, and gut-less wonders to boot.
5IVE.OH is offline  
Old 10-14-2006, 04:10 PM
  #15  
OnyxCobra
6th Gear Member
 
OnyxCobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 8,467
Default RE: My stang. Check it out.

ORIGINAL: 5IVE.OH


ORIGINAL: OnyxCobra

ORIGINAL: 5IVE.OH

That year mustang should be lumped into the same catagory as the 74-78 mustang II's
. The GTO is a bloated cavalier. Nice hood BTW.
why would you say that?
They are ugly. They look the same as the mustang II's just a bit more longer. Same gross non functioning side scoops, long nose, and gut-less wonders to boot.
yeah 86's look sooooooooo much better The SN95s and Mustang IIs look nothing alike, not even close. There have been way more than 2 body styles to have non-functional side and hood scoops... and the long nose is a trademark of the Mustang.
OnyxCobra is offline  
Old 10-14-2006, 04:19 PM
  #16  
5IVE.OH
3rd Gear Member
 
5IVE.OH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 907
Default RE: My stang. Check it out.





5IVE.OH is offline  
Old 10-14-2006, 04:21 PM
  #17  
5IVE.OH
3rd Gear Member
 
5IVE.OH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 907
Default RE: My stang. Check it out.

Mustangs look like ***. They are popular because of the go fast goodness that can be achieved cheaply. The new 05+ are tolerable becuase they reched back to when the mustang was a nice car and pulled styling cues forward. Otherwise they are quite boring to look at.
5IVE.OH is offline  
Old 10-14-2006, 04:26 PM
  #18  
OnyxCobra
6th Gear Member
 
OnyxCobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 8,467
Default RE: My stang. Check it out.

Those 2 Mustangs look nothing alike, at all. Most people on this site will disagree that mustangs are ugly. I have a feeling a lot of people were drawn to them b/c of how they look. Just as a basis for comparison, what cars do you find attractive?
OnyxCobra is offline  
Old 10-14-2006, 04:26 PM
  #19  
frdmstng1986GT
5th Gear Member
 
frdmstng1986GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Alton, New Hampshire
Posts: 2,518
Default RE: My stang. Check it out.

ORIGINAL: OnyxCobra

ORIGINAL: 5IVE.OH


ORIGINAL: OnyxCobra

ORIGINAL: 5IVE.OH

That year mustang should be lumped into the same catagory as the 74-78 mustang II's
. The GTO is a bloated cavalier. Nice hood BTW.
why would you say that?
They are ugly. They look the same as the mustang II's just a bit more longer. Same gross non functioning side scoops, long nose, and gut-less wonders to boot.
yeah 86's look sooooooooo much better The SN95s and Mustang IIs look nothing alike, not even close. There have been way more than 2 body styles to have non-functional side and hood scoops... and the long nose is a trademark of the Mustang.

C'mon man... dont take it out on the 86's.lol. and just for the record onyx. your car rocks and it sounds awsome so i am not hateing on you what so ever. jsut there are some really beautiful 86's out there.. and hopeing to make mine one soon.lol


This one is pretty sweet. Sweet 86.
frdmstng1986GT is offline  
Old 10-14-2006, 04:27 PM
  #20  
OnyxCobra
6th Gear Member
 
OnyxCobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 8,467
Default RE: My stang. Check it out.

i wasnt hating on the 86's man, i was just saying its not like an 86 mustang looks like God's gift to man and the SN95 is a pile of dog ****. I think they both look equally good in different ways. And thanks for the compliments.
OnyxCobra is offline  


Quick Reply: My stang. Check it out.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13 PM.