5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

1992 3000GT VR-4 or 5.0 stang? What would you rather have?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-22-2006, 06:02 PM
  #1  
Wick001
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Wick001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 680
Default 1992 3000GT VR-4 or 5.0 stang? What would you rather have?

Possibly buying a 1992 3000GT VR4 Twin Turbo... What do you guys think
Wick001 is offline  
Old 10-22-2006, 06:05 PM
  #2  
PRO50SC
The Rogue Mod
 
PRO50SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Maryland Sucka's!!
Posts: 21,918
Default RE: 1992 3000GT VR-4 or 5.0 stang? What would you rather have?

Stang, hands down!!

Oh and have you ever seen under the hood of one of those things? Yeah, g/l working on that POS!!!
PRO50SC is offline  
Old 10-22-2006, 06:05 PM
  #3  
93 LX FiveO
5th Gear Member
 
93 LX FiveO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Haverhill, MA
Posts: 3,664
Default RE: 1992 3000GT VR-4 or 5.0 stang? What would you rather have?

14 second car

ive worked on one at work. decently fast car with pickup but just not comparable to V8 muscle.

the front bumper fell off when i drove it off the rack.. go figure
93 LX FiveO is offline  
Old 10-22-2006, 06:09 PM
  #4  
primetime5.0
6th Gear Member
 
primetime5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 9,587
Default RE: 1992 3000GT VR-4 or 5.0 stang? What would you rather have?

you come on a mustang site asking which car we like more.. hmm...
primetime5.0 is offline  
Old 10-22-2006, 06:09 PM
  #5  
95 BLOWN GT
5th Gear Member
 
95 BLOWN GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: buying tires!
Posts: 3,220
Default RE: 1992 3000GT VR-4 or 5.0 stang? What would you rather have?

twin turbo running 14 seconds ?
95 BLOWN GT is offline  
Old 10-22-2006, 06:12 PM
  #6  
93 LX FiveO
5th Gear Member
 
93 LX FiveO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Haverhill, MA
Posts: 3,664
Default RE: 1992 3000GT VR-4 or 5.0 stang? What would you rather have?

ORIGINAL: 95 BLOWN GT

twin turbo running 14 seconds ?
sad isn't it?
93 LX FiveO is offline  
Old 10-22-2006, 06:13 PM
  #7  
Wick001
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Wick001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 680
Default RE: 1992 3000GT VR-4 or 5.0 stang? What would you rather have?

I have a 95 5.0 now, but i've seen this 92 VR4 for sale... Was wondering what you guys think.

I believe the mustang will be a lot cheaper to mod and make fast? am i right?

Which car has more potential?
Wick001 is offline  
Old 10-22-2006, 06:14 PM
  #8  
95 BLOWN GT
5th Gear Member
 
95 BLOWN GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: buying tires!
Posts: 3,220
Default RE: 1992 3000GT VR-4 or 5.0 stang? What would you rather have?

hell yeah it is. and by the way i think everyone on this site will say dont buy it. true mustang lovers anyway.
95 BLOWN GT is offline  
Old 10-22-2006, 06:16 PM
  #9  
Wick001
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Wick001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 680
Default RE: 1992 3000GT VR-4 or 5.0 stang? What would you rather have?

I've had 6 mustangs, all GT's 5.0 and 4.6. lets be honest here, they are pretty slow cars.

I've just never taken the next step into making it fast. like H/C/I, S/C, or turbo.
Wick001 is offline  
Old 10-22-2006, 06:19 PM
  #10  
PRO50SC
The Rogue Mod
 
PRO50SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Maryland Sucka's!!
Posts: 21,918
Default RE: 1992 3000GT VR-4 or 5.0 stang? What would you rather have?


ORIGINAL: Wick001

I have a 95 5.0 now, but i've seen this 92 VR4 for sale... Was wondering what you guys think.

I believe the mustang will be a lot cheaper to mod and make fast? am i right?

Which car has more potential?
Like I said, have you ever seen under the hood. There is absolutly no room under the hood to work!!!
PRO50SC is offline  


Quick Reply: 1992 3000GT VR-4 or 5.0 stang? What would you rather have?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:46 PM.