1992 3000GT VR-4 or 5.0 stang? What would you rather have?
#3
RE: 1992 3000GT VR-4 or 5.0 stang? What would you rather have?
14 second car
ive worked on one at work. decently fast car with pickup but just not comparable to V8 muscle.
the front bumper fell off when i drove it off the rack.. go figure
ive worked on one at work. decently fast car with pickup but just not comparable to V8 muscle.
the front bumper fell off when i drove it off the rack.. go figure
#7
RE: 1992 3000GT VR-4 or 5.0 stang? What would you rather have?
I have a 95 5.0 now, but i've seen this 92 VR4 for sale... Was wondering what you guys think.
I believe the mustang will be a lot cheaper to mod and make fast? am i right?
Which car has more potential?
I believe the mustang will be a lot cheaper to mod and make fast? am i right?
Which car has more potential?
#9
RE: 1992 3000GT VR-4 or 5.0 stang? What would you rather have?
I've had 6 mustangs, all GT's 5.0 and 4.6. lets be honest here, they are pretty slow cars.
I've just never taken the next step into making it fast. like H/C/I, S/C, or turbo.
I've just never taken the next step into making it fast. like H/C/I, S/C, or turbo.
#10
RE: 1992 3000GT VR-4 or 5.0 stang? What would you rather have?
ORIGINAL: Wick001
I have a 95 5.0 now, but i've seen this 92 VR4 for sale... Was wondering what you guys think.
I believe the mustang will be a lot cheaper to mod and make fast? am i right?
Which car has more potential?
I have a 95 5.0 now, but i've seen this 92 VR4 for sale... Was wondering what you guys think.
I believe the mustang will be a lot cheaper to mod and make fast? am i right?
Which car has more potential?