turbo
#11
RE: turbo
i just read your other post..... your bored 50 over and run 10.5:1 compression!! your never going to get a turbo on that motor......or a sc. compression is too high and your walls are thin. id throw that block in the trash and start over
#13
RE: turbo
ORIGINAL: 92stang302
i want to put a turbo or im looking at a $1699 supercharger but people say it will not handle any boost at all even thow it got h-beam rods balanced and blueprinted
i want to put a turbo or im looking at a $1699 supercharger but people say it will not handle any boost at all even thow it got h-beam rods balanced and blueprinted
#14
RE: turbo
ORIGINAL: luckythirteen13
i just read your other post..... your bored 50 over and run 10.5:1 compression!! your never going to get a turbo on that motor......or a sc. compression is too high and your walls are thin. id throw that block in the trash and start over
i just read your other post..... your bored 50 over and run 10.5:1 compression!! your never going to get a turbo on that motor......or a sc. compression is too high and your walls are thin. id throw that block in the trash and start over
#15
RE: turbo
i think it would be best to sell your motor and start over or pull it and start building a new one. you could run like 1/10 of a pound of boost before that thing would grenade it self really bad. 10.5:1 + .050 over = bad for boost
#18
RE: turbo
first off why the hell is it bored .50 over?...there is no meat there,and what a break in period...i'm not going to hit heat/cooling problems...your walls are so thin that the 1st time you even put a 100 shot at it those pistons are going to slap a crack in it quick!..the only way i'd consider boost is if 1 the cylinder walls were sleeved and putting some cometic head gaskets on just to bring the compression down