Are Edelbrock heads decent?
10-29-2006, 10:47 PM
#4
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 281
RE: Are Edelbrock heads decent?
I wondered the same thing, then I found the company I'm buying my engine off of, and thats is the heads they use. It was a 347 stroker blower motor with 8-10 pounds of boost and it put down 625 hp. So they must not be too bad.
10-29-2006, 10:52 PM
#6
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 3,768
RE: Are Edelbrock heads decent?
Yeah, the Performer...that's the one. Thanks for the replies folks. The thing is, if I have the money to get new heads, I'll just wait and get AFRs. I was just thinking of trying to find a set of used numbers, so I wouldn't have to wait so long, and was wondering if they were decent. What do you think the difference in hp would be between the AFR 165s and the Performers.
10-29-2006, 11:11 PM
#8
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: cape giradeau,mo
Posts: 8,872
RE: Are Edelbrock heads decent?
i sold my rpm's ported pollished and O-ringed...for $500.......they are good heads...canfield 170's would be a better choice...compared to 165's....better spring package and better valves
10-29-2006, 11:12 PM
#9
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Westminster, MD
Posts: 4,343
RE: Are Edelbrock heads decent?
ORIGINAL: grabbem88
i sold my rpm's ported pollished and O-ringed...for $500.......they are good heads...canfield 170's would be a better choice...compared to 165's....better spring package and better valves
i sold my rpm's ported pollished and O-ringed...for $500.......they are good heads...canfield 170's would be a better choice...compared to 165's....better spring package and better valves