View Poll Results: A poll
Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll
88GT vs 2kGT
4th Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,798
From:
RE: 88GT vs 2kGT
Also Dub in the 86 article they have the 86 running 14.7 @ 92 mph. And im assuming the other mustang is a 90 or 91 but it ran 14.8 @96 mph so 4 mph isnt a faster car? Im not getting how that 86 would be faster? e.t.s doesnt mean a car is faster, do you know what trap speeds are? Example i have motor trend article of a Cobra 03 getting beat by a WRX/Sti .. Pretty sure its motor trend i need to look again, BUT the Cobra was beaten by e.t. NOT by MPH . And we all know the Cobra is way faster .
I ♥ Acer
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 990
From: United States
RE: 88GT vs 2kGT
ORIGINAL: Stinger
Also Dub in the 86 article they have the 86 running 14.7 @ 92 mph. And im assuming the other mustang is a 90 or 91 but it ran 14.8 @96 mph so 4 mph isnt a faster car? Im not getting how that 86 would be faster? e.t.s doesnt mean a car is faster, do you know what trap speeds are? Example i have motor trend article of a Cobra 03 getting beat by a WRX/Sti .. Pretty sure its motor trend i need to look again, BUT the Cobra was beaten by e.t. NOT by MPH . And we all know the Cobra is way faster .
Also Dub in the 86 article they have the 86 running 14.7 @ 92 mph. And im assuming the other mustang is a 90 or 91 but it ran 14.8 @96 mph so 4 mph isnt a faster car? Im not getting how that 86 would be faster? e.t.s doesnt mean a car is faster, do you know what trap speeds are? Example i have motor trend article of a Cobra 03 getting beat by a WRX/Sti .. Pretty sure its motor trend i need to look again, BUT the Cobra was beaten by e.t. NOT by MPH . And we all know the Cobra is way faster .
This LX 5.0 ran 15.3@92 mph...
http://www.stangbangers.com/89_LX5-0_vs_Competition.htm
4th Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,798
From:
RE: 88GT vs 2kGT
Wow settle down !!! Im sorry but thats the info YOU provided so relax , read your own crap!! Doesnt say 92 mph in ur other links.. Neither of the 86 or 91 ran that slow. My high horse? Hmmm your not being very nice. I just used your magazine racing. In the real world most LX and Stock ran low 15s to mid 14s cause if they dont i guess I really never ran 14.6 @ 98 mph .. with my stock GT.. hmm go figure. Maybe i got a special edition. Isnt the verts some of the slower GTs? 
[sm=sigh.gif]
[sm=sigh.gif]
4th Gear Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,798
From:
RE: 88GT vs 2kGT
go to www.gignchips.com then after it comes up click on MUSTANG on the left and on that page there are video links the very bottom is the newest. I have all my bad runs as well as my good.I didnt hide nothing.Most peeps just put there best, be careful some are 8 minute long and boring i have some street video also.
3rd Gear Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 837
From:
RE: 88GT vs 2kGT
More importantly, isn't the '88 lighter? Or do I have it backward?
Anyway, when you compare two vehicles with twelve years between them, and the difference is not so noticable, you know there's a problem...
I vote for the '88 because I love the 302cid V8. :-)
Anyway, when you compare two vehicles with twelve years between them, and the difference is not so noticable, you know there's a problem...
I vote for the '88 because I love the 302cid V8. :-)