5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Chevy Mustang

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-26-2006, 04:17 AM
  #41  
Jugador
5th Gear Member
 
Jugador's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bangladesh
Posts: 4,840
Default RE: Chevy Mustang



he said it's a 355 with 305 heads.

damn im slow
Jugador is offline  
Old 12-26-2006, 04:26 AM
  #42  
89Ford
4th Gear Member
 
89Ford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,250
Default RE: Chevy Mustang

ORIGINAL: Jugador



he said it's a 355 with 305 heads.

damn im slow
haha yea i misread it, been a long day oh well...i guess i have to respect it then or im a hypocrit....i really dont see the point of putting a chevy in a mustang but if he already has the engine then i guess it makes sense...I would still just put it in a 3rd gen and call it a day...how much heavier are they anyways(3rd gen camaros and firebirds)?
89Ford is offline  
Old 12-26-2006, 04:57 AM
  #43  
35CI X2
 
35CI X2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Washington, Iowa
Posts: 28
Default RE: Chevy Mustang

ORIGINAL: whiteout 5.0

this is pretty heated indeed hmmm why dont they put 5.0's in mazdas rx7? why is it the ls1 motor? and you guys are right about the light car big engine thing. There was a mid engine car made by detomato or some crap called the pantera. We just had one in the shop its imported, italian supercar im pretty sure with a ford drivetrain (351c)

And why with that combo would you port the 305 heads? Wouldnt it be better to just pick up an aftermarket set and port them?
It is actuallyeasier to put a 5.0 into a first gen RX-7. It is easier to put an LS1 into a 2nd or 3rd gen RX-7. Its just how the car was made, some things are easier to put into certain cars than others.
35CI X2 is offline  
Old 12-26-2006, 02:05 PM
  #44  
SuperFox
I ♥ Acer
Thread Starter
 
SuperFox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Posts: 45
Default RE: Chevy Mustang

Ok, I am using the mustang cause, 1) it is a $400 car with a tubular chevy k member already installed, tubularcontrol arms,2) Ihave the motorand tranny already buillt. This car has no motor or tranny in it, I am using what I got. And in regards to to putting it in a 3rd gen, they are heavier than this mustang. My friend brian has a 91 camaro, 350 tune port and runs a 12.2. At 3500 pounds. With all the weight reduction doneto the mustang it ways maybe 1900 pounds. So,like I said its personal preference.
SuperFox is offline  
Old 12-26-2006, 02:30 PM
  #45  
89Ford
4th Gear Member
 
89Ford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,250
Default RE: Chevy Mustang

wow did realize they were that much heavier, i did say you should stick it in a 3rd gen i was just saying i would, b/c I like them and its easy work and there is so much room under the hood...but hey you want to stick you engine in a mustang then go for...but I still didnt get a reason to why you posted that in 5.0 tech section
89Ford is offline  
Old 12-26-2006, 03:13 PM
  #46  
bds95stang
2nd Gear Member
 
bds95stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 270
Default RE: Chevy Mustang

ORIGINAL: 88chevymustang

Well i apperciate all the positive feedback from the certain few. And to all the guys talkin **** well timeslips will be available in the spring. I am gonna say it fast is fast. Personal preference, that should be all that matters. I will be happy to acomitate any race you wanna throw, come to my town. beeyaw.
^^^^cmon u put this post up and dont expect to be flamed!!! its like pullin your d**k out in a wh*re house....its gonna get wet!!
bds95stang is offline  
Old 12-26-2006, 03:19 PM
  #47  
SuperHoss
2nd Gear Member
 
SuperHoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: GA
Posts: 261
Default RE: Chevy Mustang

Here's my belief - No Ford engines in Chevrolets and no Chevrolet engines in a Ford...basically I'm not a fan of "Cross-breeding."

Though I do admit that the Chevy small-block has more bang-for-your-buck power than most engines. Ford engines are just as good as Chevy engines, but it takes more money to make them run.
SuperHoss is offline  
Old 12-26-2006, 03:23 PM
  #48  
philthy89fifty
4th Gear Member
 
philthy89fifty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,183
Default RE: Chevy Mustang

take it as a compliment guys. the guy is saying the fox frame/chasis is solid light and better looking than anything chevy can muster.
philthy89fifty is offline  
Old 12-26-2006, 03:31 PM
  #49  
89Ford
4th Gear Member
 
89Ford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,250
Default RE: Chevy Mustang

this tread needs to be stopped it doesnt even belong in this section...the guy only said it to start trouble, want to flame him, the flame him for trying to start trouble..not b/c he is putting a chevy engine in a mustang, they're only cars for gods sake
89Ford is offline  
Old 12-26-2006, 04:30 PM
  #50  
hrd2bslw
1st Gear Member
 
hrd2bslw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 136
Default RE: Chevy Mustang

I remember there was a Fox with a 350 in it on PINKS a while back. It ran pretty good.
Its still a HALF BREED

I remember a 57 Chevy Pickup with a Ford 427 motor in it. It had Half Breed painted on the doors.

He used to use it to pull his drag car to the track. HAHA
hrd2bslw is offline  


Quick Reply: Chevy Mustang



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:40 PM.