5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

equal lenth headers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 22, 2004 | 11:11 AM
  #1  
whiteyford0212's Avatar
whiteyford0212
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 272
From:
Default equal lenth headers

i have a question for you guys i just got and installed a set of equal lenght shorty headers..the sound good, it makes the car have a throatier sound but are these good for high end or low end or both??
Old Sep 22, 2004 | 01:33 PM
  #2  
94Cbra's Avatar
94Cbra
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,487
From: Southern Kentucky
Default RE: equal lenth headers

Im pretty sure they free up the power all across the board.
Old Sep 22, 2004 | 02:03 PM
  #3  
vfast's Avatar
vfast
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,394
From:
Default RE: equal lenth headers

well you didn't say what size the primary tubes are....but they help mid range power
Old Sep 22, 2004 | 03:58 PM
  #4  
Fishhawk's Avatar
Fishhawk
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 180
From:
Default RE: equal lenth headers

They're more for low end to mid range. If you want high power you'll need long tube.
Old Sep 22, 2004 | 09:59 PM
  #5  
vfast's Avatar
vfast
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,394
From:
Default RE: equal lenth headers

you will never realize the difference in the long tubes and shorties unless you pulling about 450 @ the wheel
Old Sep 22, 2004 | 10:53 PM
  #6  
roundman's Avatar
roundman
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,813
From:
Default RE: equal lenth headers

agree with that other "old man" vfast on this one! I'm running equal lenght MAC 1-5/8" shorty headers and they work fine with my basically stock engine and were also real good on the street when I still drove it on the street. a recent 5.0 mag did a dyno test of different types and sizes of headers on a 347 stroker and the long tubes were only 5 HP better than the shorties at 5,500 rpm, so make it easy on yourself and go with the shorties.
Old Sep 23, 2004 | 12:32 PM
  #7  
FoxGT's Avatar
FoxGT
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,451
From: United States
Default RE: equal lenth headers

I was reading a magazine @ the bookstore on this on a 90 5.0. The equal gave more hp from low to mid-range. & the unequal gave more hp than the equals in high rpm's. Long tubes beat both of them in low, mid, & high range. It showed as much as 8hp increase over both the others.
Old Sep 23, 2004 | 05:18 PM
  #8  
619socalstang's Avatar
619socalstang
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 850
From:
Default RE: equal lenth headers

putting equal length long tubes on a stang is not worth 8 hp it is a pain, long tubes are a breeze but long tube equal length are almost impossible, not even if they were free would i install them.
Old Sep 23, 2004 | 05:44 PM
  #9  
FoxGT's Avatar
FoxGT
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,451
From: United States
Default RE: equal lenth headers

ROFL. Yea, I heard they were a b**** to install.
Old Sep 24, 2004 | 11:05 AM
  #10  
LOVEMY88GT's Avatar
LOVEMY88GT
I ♥ Acer
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,031
From:
Default RE: equal lenth headers

Your tellin me i did them and i went threw all hell but i got them on and they feel get and sound great. They seem to work good with my Offroad H and Flowmasters. I had Mac Long Tube so idk if people buy those much. I think they look good and they seemed good but they were like putting regular exasht in a little spot in the engine bay. Man oh man it was not really easy but there done and im happy.

Nick
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
19
Dec 19, 2023 01:12 PM
Roxon68
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
17
Mar 17, 2016 08:13 PM
junior04
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
1
Sep 28, 2015 10:53 AM
Daddys Girls GTs
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
3
Sep 14, 2015 08:46 PM
BrantleyS550
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
0
Sep 14, 2015 04:18 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:42 AM.