Guys who owned fox and SN95 pls reply
01-07-2007, 01:54 AM
#13
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 799
RE: Guys who owned fow and SN95 pls reply
I almost bought a black notch...If i had the money i would have a fox race car and a street SN95 notch. I bought my 94 because it was just a nicer car. They pretty much cost the same. Plus the SN95 has rear discs, 5 lug, abs, power everything and they look sick as hell! I love 'em both though. I dont know about them being more expensive to mod, maybe computer wise...its the same friggin engine.
01-07-2007, 02:00 AM
#14
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 646
RE: Guys who owned fow and SN95 pls reply
ORIGINAL: musclemustang94
I almost bought a black notch...If i had the money i would have a fox race car and a street SN95 notch. I bought my 94 because it was just a nicer car. They pretty much cost the same. Plus the SN95 has rear discs, 5 lug, abs, power everything and they look sick as hell! I love 'em both though. I dont know about them being more expensive to mod, maybe computer wise...its the same friggin engine.
I almost bought a black notch...If i had the money i would have a fox race car and a street SN95 notch. I bought my 94 because it was just a nicer car. They pretty much cost the same. Plus the SN95 has rear discs, 5 lug, abs, power everything and they look sick as hell! I love 'em both though. I dont know about them being more expensive to mod, maybe computer wise...its the same friggin engine.
01-07-2007, 03:29 AM
#17
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lil' Rhody
Posts: 22,376
RE: Guys who owned fow and SN95 pls reply
ORIGINAL: luckythirteen13
cons: 94-95 have less hp, weight a lot more and the motors have hyper pistons.
pros: cant think of any
cons: 94-95 have less hp, weight a lot more and the motors have hyper pistons.
pros: cant think of any
What do you consider the weight if its "alot more"?
93's had hyper pistons as well
ORIGINAL: Boss_Hotrod
94-95 have less head room, a little harder to access motor
94-95 have less head room, a little harder to access motor
A little harder to access the motor??? the only difference in the engine bays between the two styles in room in front of the motor for that big stupid clutch fan, and room above the motor to allow for heat to disapate under that big steel hood
ORIGINAL: ddeaton66
They both have many pro's and con's. Looks aside (which is a personal preference), sn95's have greater creature comfort and are inherently safer because of the technology for crashworthiness improves each year. Con's - They are slightly heavier (500# or so depending on the model) and can be trickier and sometimes more expensive to mod.
They both have many pro's and con's. Looks aside (which is a personal preference), sn95's have greater creature comfort and are inherently safer because of the technology for crashworthiness improves each year. Con's - They are slightly heavier (500# or so depending on the model) and can be trickier and sometimes more expensive to mod.
A STOCK SN-95 COBRA weighs 3365 with power windows, power door locks, power mirrors, power drivers seat, a REAL stereo system, AND air conditioning.... AND THATS NOT EVEN THE LIGHTEST!!! the 95GTS weighs a mere 3150 lbs...
So you fox owners really need to take your heads out of your ***. You foxes arent all they are cracked up to be. I'll take a car with style and comfort over something that rattles like a tin can and is a mere... 2/10's or a second faster in the quarter.
Im really sick of these one sided arguments, no one 79-95 is better than the other. They all have the same heart, and thats all that matters.
FOR CHRIST ****ING SAKE.... ATLEAST IM DRIVING A FORD!!!!!!
01-07-2007, 03:57 AM
#18
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fredericksburg, Virginia
Posts: 1,175
RE: Guys who owned fow and SN95 pls reply
ORIGINAL: AdderMk2
SN-95's had just as much HP
What do you consider the weight if its "alot more"?
93's had hyper pistons as well
SN-95's did not have less headroom, Infact, the passenger compartment was made LARGER in the SN-95
A little harder to access the motor??? the only difference in the engine bays between the two styles in room in front of the motor for that big stupid clutch fan, and room above the motor to allow for heat to disapate under that big steel hood
500 pounds difference huh??? the lightest factory trim fox body would be a notch... tipping the scales at 3023lbs. thats with manual windows, manual locks, and no A/C
A STOCK SN-95 COBRA weighs 3365 with power windows, power door locks, power mirrors, power drivers seat, a REAL stereo system, AND air conditioning.... AND THATS NOT EVEN THE LIGHTEST!!! the 95GTS weighs a mere 3150 lbs...
So you fox owners really need to take your heads out of your ***. You foxes arent all they are cracked up to be. I'll take a car with style and comfort over something that rattles like a tin can and is a mere... 2/10's or a second faster in the quarter.
Im really sick of these one sided arguments, no one 79-95 is better than the other. They all have the same heart, and thats all that matters.
FOR CHRIST ****ING SAKE.... ATLEAST IM DRIVING A FORD!!!!!!
ORIGINAL: luckythirteen13
cons: 94-95 have less hp, weight a lot more and the motors have hyper pistons.
pros: cant think of any
cons: 94-95 have less hp, weight a lot more and the motors have hyper pistons.
pros: cant think of any
What do you consider the weight if its "alot more"?
93's had hyper pistons as well
ORIGINAL: Boss_Hotrod
94-95 have less head room, a little harder to access motor
94-95 have less head room, a little harder to access motor
A little harder to access the motor??? the only difference in the engine bays between the two styles in room in front of the motor for that big stupid clutch fan, and room above the motor to allow for heat to disapate under that big steel hood
ORIGINAL: ddeaton66
They both have many pro's and con's. Looks aside (which is a personal preference), sn95's have greater creature comfort and are inherently safer because of the technology for crashworthiness improves each year. Con's - They are slightly heavier (500# or so depending on the model) and can be trickier and sometimes more expensive to mod.
They both have many pro's and con's. Looks aside (which is a personal preference), sn95's have greater creature comfort and are inherently safer because of the technology for crashworthiness improves each year. Con's - They are slightly heavier (500# or so depending on the model) and can be trickier and sometimes more expensive to mod.
A STOCK SN-95 COBRA weighs 3365 with power windows, power door locks, power mirrors, power drivers seat, a REAL stereo system, AND air conditioning.... AND THATS NOT EVEN THE LIGHTEST!!! the 95GTS weighs a mere 3150 lbs...
So you fox owners really need to take your heads out of your ***. You foxes arent all they are cracked up to be. I'll take a car with style and comfort over something that rattles like a tin can and is a mere... 2/10's or a second faster in the quarter.
Im really sick of these one sided arguments, no one 79-95 is better than the other. They all have the same heart, and thats all that matters.
FOR CHRIST ****ING SAKE.... ATLEAST IM DRIVING A FORD!!!!!!
01-07-2007, 04:21 AM
#19
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: KY
Posts: 13,396
RE: Guys who owned fow and SN95 pls reply
ORIGINAL: 8URWS6
con #1 for me, I couldn't get my tall butt in there. I'm 6'3 and my knees were in my chest.
con #1 for me, I couldn't get my tall butt in there. I'm 6'3 and my knees were in my chest.
