Guys who owned fox and SN95 pls reply
01-10-2007, 07:11 PM
#71
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lil' Rhody
Posts: 22,376
RE: Guys who owned fow and SN95 pls reply
ORIGINAL: 94gtcoupe
haha i figured you ment 96-98... the 94-95 are much more responcive than the 96-98... the only thing i don't like is trying to find some parts for the 94-95 since it was only a 2 year model... most of the time i have to order parts for 91-93 (engine parts) or 96-98 (body parts) talk about a PITA
haha i figured you ment 96-98... the 94-95 are much more responcive than the 96-98... the only thing i don't like is trying to find some parts for the 94-95 since it was only a 2 year model... most of the time i have to order parts for 91-93 (engine parts) or 96-98 (body parts) talk about a PITA
ORIGINAL: 88blackgt
i apologize, i meant 96-98. good thing i reread that, alot of people would be angry with me haha
i apologize, i meant 96-98. good thing i reread that, alot of people would be angry with me haha
01-10-2007, 09:03 PM
#72
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,826
RE: Guys who owned fow and SN95 pls reply
ORIGINAL: AdderMk2
good choice. not a fan of the horizontals
yea, like the 97 tailights I just bought because i hate how stupid the horizontals look
ORIGINAL: 94gtcoupe
haha i figured you ment 96-98... the 94-95 are much more responcive than the 96-98... the only thing i don't like is trying to find some parts for the 94-95 since it was only a 2 year model... most of the time i have to order parts for 91-93 (engine parts) or 96-98 (body parts) talk about a PITA
haha i figured you ment 96-98... the 94-95 are much more responcive than the 96-98... the only thing i don't like is trying to find some parts for the 94-95 since it was only a 2 year model... most of the time i have to order parts for 91-93 (engine parts) or 96-98 (body parts) talk about a PITA
ORIGINAL: 88blackgt
i apologize, i meant 96-98. good thing i reread that, alot of people would be angry with me haha
i apologize, i meant 96-98. good thing i reread that, alot of people would be angry with me haha
yea, like the 97 tailights I just bought because i hate how stupid the horizontals look
01-10-2007, 10:15 PM
#73
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 3,768
RE: Guys who owned fow and SN95 pls reply
ORIGINAL: 94gtcoupe
the early 4.6's are deff. dogs, and from what i have heard they have a lot of problems
the early 4.6's are deff. dogs, and from what i have heard they have a lot of problems
ORIGINAL: Twisted
I agree that the 96-98s are dogs. I kept test driving them thinking that something was wrong with them, before coming to the conclusion that they just don't get off the line very quickly...at least stock.
ORIGINAL: 88blackgt
94-98s are DOGS
94-98s are DOGS
01-10-2007, 10:22 PM
#74
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 80
RE: Guys who owned fow and SN95 pls reply
You know I owned a 88 GT and I loved that car, now I own a 94 GT. I put a lot of money into both of them and they were and still are great cars. This whole thing between Fox and Sn-95 owners sounds like a bunch of high school **** griping about whether ricers or muscle is better. The way I see nobody should be b$%^&ing about what is better but remember that this all for the mustang and the people who love the mustang. I am thinking about buying a 83 T-top 5.0 most of you think it is an ugly a$$ car but for $2,000 you can't beat that. Sorry about the venting but I hate fighting when they are all mustangs.
01-10-2007, 11:31 PM
#75
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 240
RE: Guys who owned fow and SN95 pls reply
You know I owned a 88 GT and I loved that car, now I own a 94 GT. I put a lot of money into both of them and they were and still are great cars. This whole thing between Fox and Sn-95 owners sounds like a bunch of high school **** griping about whether ricers or muscle is better. The way I see nobody should be b$%^&ing about what is better but remember that this all for the mustang and the people who love the mustang. I am thinking about buying a 83 T-top 5.0 most of you think it is an ugly a$$ car but for $2,000 you can't beat that. Sorry about the venting but I hate fighting when they are all mustangs.
This is just another guy trying to get everyone to side with him n say "yeah, I agree, +1"
... so there you go, i saved you the trouble.
01-11-2007, 02:33 AM
#76
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: michigan, living in O Hi Hoe
Posts: 2,809
RE: Guys who owned fow and SN95 pls reply
this isn't realy a lot of fighting, it's mostly differences in them and people saying they prefer they like one more than the other, most people explain why... i personaly like foxes but i drive a SN95 and i love it, if it wasn't for the fact of all the foxes i looked at where pretty beat and noise (lots of rattles) i would have prolly got one... for me i wanted some thing that handles, and has sleek lines.. don't get me wrong i like the way most foxes look but i found a nice sn before i found a fox that i liked.. for me it was all about the 5.0 power ,both cars have tons of potential, yea the sn is 300 lbs (approx.)more but nothing that can't be taken care of...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MustangForums Editor
Saleen, Roush and Boss Mustangs
7
09-16-2015 02:11 PM
HorsePower99
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
1
08-26-2015 11:29 PM
