Guys who owned fox and SN95 pls reply
01-07-2007, 04:52 AM
#21
4th Gear Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: California
Posts: 1,259
RE: Guys who owned fow and SN95 pls reply
94-95 have less hp, weight a lot more and the motors have hyper pistons.
01-07-2007, 12:42 PM
#24
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 133
RE: Guys who owned fow and SN95 pls reply
ORIGINAL: HC_CrAzYHoRsE
you say it's a "chick car" like it's a good thing [sm=smiley36.gif]
ORIGINAL: shibby_cbs
Sn95 = Sexy Chick Magnet
Fox = All Business
Sn95 = Sexy Chick Magnet
Fox = All Business
I would go with the fox simply because of the computer. Some people don't have any problems with the 94-95 computer, but mine doesn't respond to mods anywhere nears as good as my 88 did.
One con of my fox was the chassis. It felt like I was driving around in a tin can. The unibody of the SN-95 provides a much more comfortable ride.
Ultimately it's a personal preference. Test drive one of each, stock or with equal power, and make a decision from there.
01-07-2007, 12:50 PM
#25
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 8,401
RE: Guys who owned fow and SN95 pls reply
ORIGINAL: blk95snake
Actually, he said, "chick magnet", which is more true for the SN-95 than the fox. My ex hated my 88 fox and my 94 cobra starts more conversations with women.
ORIGINAL: HC_CrAzYHoRsE
you say it's a "chick car" like it's a good thing [sm=smiley36.gif]
ORIGINAL: shibby_cbs
Sn95 = Sexy Chick Magnet
Fox = All Business
Sn95 = Sexy Chick Magnet
Fox = All Business
...high-heel shoe stores and cute little puppies are chick magnets too, see what i mean? [sm=smiley17.gif]. i'm kidding, but it's all good, my GF prefers the notches to any other stang model... aside from the 69s, but hey, who doesn't.
01-07-2007, 12:52 PM
#26
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lil' Rhody
Posts: 22,376
RE: Guys who owned fow and SN95 pls reply
ORIGINAL: HC_CrAzYHoRsE
same difference ...high-heel shoe stores and cute little puppies are chick magnets too, see what i mean? [sm=smiley17.gif]. i'm kidding, but it's all good, my GF prefers the notches to any other stang model... aside from the 69s, but hey, who doesn't.
same difference
...high-heel shoe stores and cute little puppies are chick magnets too, see what i mean? [sm=smiley17.gif]. i'm kidding, but it's all good, my GF prefers the notches to any other stang model... aside from the 69s, but hey, who doesn't.
01-07-2007, 01:15 PM
#28
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: new jersey
Posts: 6,635
RE: Guys who owned fow and SN95 pls reply
ORIGINAL: AdderMk2
SN-95's had just as much HP
What do you consider the weight if its "alot more"?
93's had hyper pistons as well
SN-95's did not have less headroom, Infact, the passenger compartment was made LARGER in the SN-95
A little harder to access the motor??? the only difference in the engine bays between the two styles in room in front of the motor for that big stupid clutch fan, and room above the motor to allow for heat to disapate under that big steel hood
500 pounds difference huh??? the lightest factory trim fox body would be a notch... tipping the scales at 3023lbs. thats with manual windows, manual locks, and no A/C
A STOCK SN-95 COBRA weighs 3365 with power windows, power door locks, power mirrors, power drivers seat, a REAL stereo system, AND air conditioning.... AND THATS NOT EVEN THE LIGHTEST!!! the 95GTS weighs a mere 3150 lbs...
So you fox owners really need to take your heads out of your ***. You foxes arent all they are cracked up to be. I'll take a car with style and comfort over something that rattles like a tin can and is a mere... 2/10's or a second faster in the quarter.
Im really sick of these one sided arguments, no one 79-95 is better than the other. They all have the same heart, and thats all that matters.
FOR CHRIST ****ING SAKE.... ATLEAST IM DRIVING A FORD!!!!!!
ORIGINAL: luckythirteen13
cons: 94-95 have less hp, weight a lot more and the motors have hyper pistons.
pros: cant think of any
cons: 94-95 have less hp, weight a lot more and the motors have hyper pistons.
pros: cant think of any
What do you consider the weight if its "alot more"?
93's had hyper pistons as well
ORIGINAL: Boss_Hotrod
94-95 have less head room, a little harder to access motor
94-95 have less head room, a little harder to access motor
A little harder to access the motor??? the only difference in the engine bays between the two styles in room in front of the motor for that big stupid clutch fan, and room above the motor to allow for heat to disapate under that big steel hood
ORIGINAL: ddeaton66
They both have many pro's and con's. Looks aside (which is a personal preference), sn95's have greater creature comfort and are inherently safer because of the technology for crashworthiness improves each year. Con's - They are slightly heavier (500# or so depending on the model) and can be trickier and sometimes more expensive to mod.
They both have many pro's and con's. Looks aside (which is a personal preference), sn95's have greater creature comfort and are inherently safer because of the technology for crashworthiness improves each year. Con's - They are slightly heavier (500# or so depending on the model) and can be trickier and sometimes more expensive to mod.
A STOCK SN-95 COBRA weighs 3365 with power windows, power door locks, power mirrors, power drivers seat, a REAL stereo system, AND air conditioning.... AND THATS NOT EVEN THE LIGHTEST!!! the 95GTS weighs a mere 3150 lbs...
So you fox owners really need to take your heads out of your ***. You foxes arent all they are cracked up to be. I'll take a car with style and comfort over something that rattles like a tin can and is a mere... 2/10's or a second faster in the quarter.
Im really sick of these one sided arguments, no one 79-95 is better than the other. They all have the same heart, and thats all that matters.
FOR CHRIST ****ING SAKE.... ATLEAST IM DRIVING A FORD!!!!!!
01-07-2007, 01:27 PM
#29
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Jackson,TN
Posts: 657
RE: Guys who owned fow and SN95 pls reply
there both awesome cars...it depends on what you want.... I love both..... I fell in love with the fox when i was 12 years old in 92 and wanted one every since and still love the look of the car..... but i also love the sn-95 5.0 simply for the interior as far as body styling i like the fox and sn-95 equal.... but you cant go wrong with either car....
not all foxes rattle by the way. mine doesnt just depends on how the car was kept up.....
as far as one being a chick magnet my wife loves my car and shes 24 so i could care less which one attracts the women,,,,,,, but ive seen several women young and older that love the fox just as much as sn-95... but at the same time who wants a women with them because of what the have ,recipe for disaster there...
but i agree we need to stop putting the other one down there both awesome cars and deserve respect..
not all foxes rattle by the way. mine doesnt just depends on how the car was kept up.....
as far as one being a chick magnet my wife loves my car and shes 24 so i could care less which one attracts the women,,,,,,, but ive seen several women young and older that love the fox just as much as sn-95... but at the same time who wants a women with them because of what the have ,recipe for disaster there...
but i agree we need to stop putting the other one down there both awesome cars and deserve respect..
