5.0 vs 4.6
#21
RE: 5.0 vs 4.6
ORIGINAL: ponyboy88
id like to see ford produce another 302 built like the double overhead cams in the 4.6, basically re-up the displacement with the new tech and put it in the new mustangs
id like to see ford produce another 302 built like the double overhead cams in the 4.6, basically re-up the displacement with the new tech and put it in the new mustangs
#23
RE: 5.0 vs 4.6
ORIGINAL: 89Ford
they have a 5.0 cammer but i dont think they put it into any cars
ORIGINAL: ponyboy88
id like to see ford produce another 302 built like the double overhead cams in the 4.6, basically re-up the displacement with the new tech and put it in the new mustangs
id like to see ford produce another 302 built like the double overhead cams in the 4.6, basically re-up the displacement with the new tech and put it in the new mustangs
#25
RE: 5.0 vs 4.6
do you guys think the 4.6 stock has 225 like the 5.0's do?A book told me that, but yet, a guy I know thats big into mustangs says they have 260 stock..what do you guys think? I have two 5.0's...its the way to go, but my grey (auto) cant be a 4.6 (stick), but I'm thinkin my red one can just cause its a stick
#26
RE: 5.0 vs 4.6
u have to understand... 96-98 they did put out 225<or something like that. 99+ they changed heads "PI" heads... they make 250 or so, not exactly sure, but around there.
and ford is bringing back the 5.0, im prty sure some new stangs are gonna have the new 5.0 in them. some kinda special edition ones.<its in 5.0 or MM&FF.
the 5.0 makes better tq then the 4.6.
stock for stock a foxbody, or sn95 will beat a 96-98 4.6, but not a 99+.
personally, tho its older technology, i like pushrod motors better, just my opinion tho. there simpler, and easy to work on. never took apart an ohc v8 yet, so idk bout them, seems like there is a good bit more work involved in them.
and ford is bringing back the 5.0, im prty sure some new stangs are gonna have the new 5.0 in them. some kinda special edition ones.<its in 5.0 or MM&FF.
the 5.0 makes better tq then the 4.6.
stock for stock a foxbody, or sn95 will beat a 96-98 4.6, but not a 99+.
personally, tho its older technology, i like pushrod motors better, just my opinion tho. there simpler, and easy to work on. never took apart an ohc v8 yet, so idk bout them, seems like there is a good bit more work involved in them.
#27
RE: 5.0 vs 4.6
the 5.0 have way more low end torque. i can rip by friends 97 4.6 every time. but they do make good power up top
#29
RE: 5.0 vs 4.6
ORIGINAL: 97modifiedmustangGT
Okay kyle you forgot to mention that that was the second day I had my licence and you have been driving for a year. We have never really had a fair race, especially after your done with your car.[:@]
the 5.0 have way more low end torque. i can rip by friends 97 4.6 every time. but they do make good power up top
#30
RE: 5.0 vs 4.6
ORIGINAL: txtomcat07
do you guys think the 4.6 stock has 225 like the 5.0's do?A book told me that, but yet, a guy I know thats big into mustangs says they have 260 stock..what do you guys think? I have two 5.0's...its the way to go, but my grey (auto) cant be a 4.6 (stick), but I'm thinkin my red one can just cause its a stick
do you guys think the 4.6 stock has 225 like the 5.0's do?A book told me that, but yet, a guy I know thats big into mustangs says they have 260 stock..what do you guys think? I have two 5.0's...its the way to go, but my grey (auto) cant be a 4.6 (stick), but I'm thinkin my red one can just cause its a stick