Edalbrock or Holly
#3
RE: Edalbrock or Holly
there is a big difference between the two edlebrock sucks its a nice looking quadrajet holley will produce a lot more power and is a lot easier to tune edlebrock just looks nice but they suck go with a holley that what was made to work on the 5.0 motors the foxes that came from the factory carb had holley's get a 600 cfm with vacuum secondaries very good carb thats what i have on mine amazing
#5
RE: Edalbrock or Holly
ORIGINAL: EliteTuners
Never heard of Edalbrock
Never heard of Edalbrock
#6
#7
RE: Edalbrock or Holly
holley is better for power but theres no way its easier to tune in then an edelbrock. depends on how often and what temperatures you drive it in. I wouldnt want a holley on a cold morning but i wouldnt want an edelbrock at the track.
#8
RE: Edalbrock or Holly
ORIGINAL: Mustangkiler
holley is better for power but theres no way its easier to tune in then an edelbrock.
holley is better for power but theres no way its easier to tune in then an edelbrock.
-P.
#10
RE: Edalbrock or Holly
Edelbrocks are easier to tune, but I have had both and my holley was more reliable. Given a choice I would go with the holley, vac. secondaries a must for the street and buy new don't go with one from a rebuild shop.