|
RE: fastest stock 5.0
How come a sn95 cant run low 14s stock like a fox?
|
RE: fastest stock 5.0
Check out these links...a Mustang History Lesson :eek:
http://www.mustangregistry.org/year.htm http://home.pon.net/hunnicutt/history.htm |
RE: fastest stock 5.0
an sn95 can't run low 14's because they are 250+ lb heavier than a fox. also i heard that they change the fireing order in 94 that resulted in a loss of power but i not 100% sure about that.
|
RE: fastest stock 5.0
|
RE: fastest stock 5.0
firing order is the same, some foxes made a published 225hp, sn95 is 215. sn95 is about 300lbs heavier
|
RE: fastest stock 5.0
93's should be faster cause the hypereutectic pistons are lighter than forged. Forged is better for a power adder but if going for stock it would be 93.
|
RE: fastest stock 5.0
ORIGINAL: stang8689 93's should be faster cause the hypereutectic pistons are lighter than forged. Forged is better for a power adder but if going for stock it would be 93. |
RE: fastest stock 5.0
87-88 5 speed coupes were the quickest stock (speed density and different cam).
|
RE: fastest stock 5.0
ORIGINAL: tp65 How come a sn95 cant run low 14s stock like a fox? I put my car into the 13's with just exhaust |
RE: fastest stock 5.0
ORIGINAL: AdderMk2 ORIGINAL: tp65 How come a sn95 cant run low 14s stock like a fox? I put my car into the 13's with just exhaust |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:59 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands