5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

O2 or NOT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-26-2007, 01:40 AM
  #1  
89bulletlx
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
89bulletlx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 84
Default O2 or NOT

Ok i have a 89 lx .Well when it was up on the lift to day i saw the 02 where cut and taped off. should i buy new ones or not the car runs goodor will it run better with o2
89bulletlx is offline  
Old 08-26-2007, 07:16 AM
  #2  
samseed101
6th Gear Member
 
samseed101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 5,693
Default RE: O2 or NOT

Do you have a chip or something? if someone removed the O2 sensors then they either tuned the car to run in open loop all the time, or you're throwing a CEL and the car is all ****ed up.
samseed101 is offline  
Old 08-26-2007, 08:31 AM
  #3  
89bulletlx
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
89bulletlx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 84
Default RE: O2 or NOT

i am not sure if it has a chip i know iam not haveing any codes. what is cel
89bulletlx is offline  
Old 08-26-2007, 09:00 AM
  #4  
samseed101
6th Gear Member
 
samseed101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Maine
Posts: 5,693
Default RE: O2 or NOT

CEL = check engine light. You have no O2 sensors yet you have no codes and no driveability problems? Okay, just to make sure... we're talking about fuel injected right? You don't have a carb do you?
samseed101 is offline  
Old 08-26-2007, 09:05 AM
  #5  
tmajikman
5th Gear Member
 
tmajikman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodstock, GA
Posts: 2,594
Default RE: O2 or NOT

He may need to run the koeo and koer tests to view his codes, the cel does not really let you know very much about the codes you may or may not have, the tests are the only real way to find out.
tmajikman is offline  
Old 08-26-2007, 09:13 AM
  #6  
89bulletlx
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
89bulletlx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 84
Default RE: O2 or NOT

Yes its a efi the motor has a Edelbrock Performer RPM U/L intake,msd 6a box, stock cam and heads i think, under drive pulleys thats all i know of just but the car
89bulletlx is offline  
Old 08-26-2007, 09:18 AM
  #7  
iceman89gt
4th Gear Member
 
iceman89gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,207
Default RE: O2 or NOT

i dont have mine on either but its been tuned out by my piggy back chip. you can tell if you have a chip by removing the kick panel on the passenger side interior which will reveal the computer. look on the bottom end of the computer, the end facing the floor board and you will see the chip piggy backed on given its a flashed chip.
iceman89gt is offline  
Old 08-26-2007, 09:20 AM
  #8  
Joel5.0
5th Gear Member
 
Joel5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,926
Default RE: O2 or NOT

If it's EFI....you do need the O2s for the system to work to spec + learn from its adjustments (=adaptive strategy) however, you haven't had any "driveability" problems due to the system being able to estimate the A/F, and no other circuits have had a problem. I've worked on, and known of other cases, where the O2s have been "on vacation" for years w/out major driveability problems....the system will auto compensate by using the other sensors and "estimate" A/F under the FMEM strategy it will automatically switch to....+ there are O2 failures that will cause the system to run better if the O2 is not connected......you do need to replace them though.....and confirm there are no other problems by running the self-tests.
Joel5.0 is offline  
Old 08-26-2007, 09:30 AM
  #9  
iceman89gt
4th Gear Member
 
iceman89gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,207
Default RE: O2 or NOT

joel you can program a chip to send dummy 02 readings to the computer thus keeping good idle characteristics. once in open loop the info from the 02s are useless thus no need for 02sto be hooked up if piggy back chip is burned to send the desired signal. another thing is that koeo or koer tests are useless if a chip is in place. the factory setup must be in place for this to work.
iceman89gt is offline  
Old 08-26-2007, 09:35 AM
  #10  
89bulletlx
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
89bulletlx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 84
Default RE: O2 or NOT

Yea i just looked there is no piggy back chip. looks like i need to get some new o2s maybe it will help my mpg cuz i think it runs rich but not real sure
89bulletlx is offline  



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:28 AM.