Cam clearance
#11
RE: Cam clearance
88 was the old car. I am building a 93 mass air. I am looking for A LOT of low end. I had great power through out the rpm's with my old setup with a stock cam. I know the e cam is great for low end so thats probably what i will go with as long with the 1.7's.
[align=left] [/align]
[align=left] [/align]
#12
RE: Cam clearance
man... spend the ~200 for 1.7s on something else...
im in the process of putting the valve train in my car... i have an 800$ budget... and i was going to get 1.7s... but w. stock heads... its just not gonna be worth it... u might get a little gain... but their still stock heads
ur getting valve springs right?
e cam has some low/mid range power yea, buddy used to have one in his fox... but there are better cams out there
im in the process of putting the valve train in my car... i have an 800$ budget... and i was going to get 1.7s... but w. stock heads... its just not gonna be worth it... u might get a little gain... but their still stock heads
ur getting valve springs right?
e cam has some low/mid range power yea, buddy used to have one in his fox... but there are better cams out there
#13
RE: Cam clearance
I made 234 rwhp on a stock motor, stock heads, and a stock cam. I am gonna use the stock heads, just cause it is the way i wanna go. I am wanna go with the 1.7's. I've ran my hole setup idea through a bunch of people and they all say it will work.
[align=left] [/align]
[align=left] [/align]
#15
RE: Cam clearance
ORIGINAL: SuperFox88
I made 234 rwhp on a stock motor, stock heads, and a stock cam. I am gonna use the stock heads, just cause it is the way i wanna go. I am wanna go with the 1.7's. I've ran my hole setup idea through a bunch of people and they all say it will work.
[align=left][/align]
I made 234 rwhp on a stock motor, stock heads, and a stock cam. I am gonna use the stock heads, just cause it is the way i wanna go. I am wanna go with the 1.7's. I've ran my hole setup idea through a bunch of people and they all say it will work.
[align=left][/align]
#16
RE: Cam clearance
ORIGINAL: SuperFox88
I made 234 rwhp on a stock motor, stock heads, and a stock cam. I am gonna use the stock heads, just cause it is the way i wanna go. I am wanna go with the 1.7's. I've ran my hole setup idea through a bunch of people and they all say it will work.
[align=left] [/align]
I made 234 rwhp on a stock motor, stock heads, and a stock cam. I am gonna use the stock heads, just cause it is the way i wanna go. I am wanna go with the 1.7's. I've ran my hole setup idea through a bunch of people and they all say it will work.
[align=left] [/align]
but w/e man... if ur gonna be that stubborn... "bottom line. e w. 1.7s or f w. 1.6" then you obviously dont need anyone heres opinion... seems like ur idea is set in stone... but pft... what do we know? i mean mjr owns a ****ing shop... and his car runs 11s(right?, if not its faster...) and im doing my cam/valve train RIGHT NOW. and have spend hours upon hours looking into it... but u seem to know what ur doing... flip a coin...let F be heads, and E be tails... i suggest a best outa three
#18
RE: Cam clearance
ORIGINAL: dimebag
sorry dude but theres no ****ing way... stock claims 225 AT THE CRANK, your telling me you some how gained hp thru ur drive train? something, actually more then just something is NOT stock...
but w/e man... if ur gonna be that stubborn... "bottom line. e w. 1.7s or f w. 1.6" then you obviously dont need anyone heres opinion... seems like ur idea is set in stone... but pft... what do we know? i mean mjr owns a ****ing shop... and his car runs 11s(right?, if not its faster...) and im doing my cam/valve train RIGHT NOW. and have spend hours upon hours looking into it... but u seem to know what ur doing... flip a coin...let F be heads, and E be tails... i suggest a best outa three
ORIGINAL: SuperFox88
I made 234 rwhp on a stock motor, stock heads, and a stock cam. I am gonna use the stock heads, just cause it is the way i wanna go. I am wanna go with the 1.7's. I've ran my hole setup idea through a bunch of people and they all say it will work.
[align=left][/align]
I made 234 rwhp on a stock motor, stock heads, and a stock cam. I am gonna use the stock heads, just cause it is the way i wanna go. I am wanna go with the 1.7's. I've ran my hole setup idea through a bunch of people and they all say it will work.
[align=left][/align]
but w/e man... if ur gonna be that stubborn... "bottom line. e w. 1.7s or f w. 1.6" then you obviously dont need anyone heres opinion... seems like ur idea is set in stone... but pft... what do we know? i mean mjr owns a ****ing shop... and his car runs 11s(right?, if not its faster...) and im doing my cam/valve train RIGHT NOW. and have spend hours upon hours looking into it... but u seem to know what ur doing... flip a coin...let F be heads, and E be tails... i suggest a best outa three
#19
RE: Cam clearance
idk what u say... stock parts... u can play w. timing, fuel pressure, etc etc etc etc all u want... STOCK it wont do that... unless you did some port , ok alota port work... and if thats the case, and ur not telling us ur exact set up, how should we suggest a cam???
dont feel bad mjr, mines apart too, lol
dont feel bad mjr, mines apart too, lol
#20
RE: Cam clearance
Personally i would not go with a letter cam either....They are alright cams, but you can do better. Research a little bit more. Alphabet cams are "outdated" persay, there are multiple other cams you can go with if you looking to get the most power possible with your setup. Research.