1991 gt rear end question
#1
1991 gt rear end question
Hi, im going to be driving my 1991 mustang gt hatch soon and i like everything about the car except for the rear end, particularly the god awful spoiler.. i cant stand it, it has to go lol. Anyways that being said ive been thinking about getting the GTX rear end by extreme dimensions which can be seen here http://www.cruizinconcepts.com/detai...d=8393CONCEPTX The trunk and rear window is what i am concerned about. Will this work with a hatchback? The rear window is basically the trunk lid as where this looks like its sealing the rear window completly and adding a new trunk lid.
Also i was wondering if anybody had come across any pictures of a fox with this kit.
thx
Also i was wondering if anybody had come across any pictures of a fox with this kit.
thx
#2
RE: 1991 gt rear end question
I think any type of body kit is lame...put some LX tail lights in it and call it a day....bodykits are for honda's.... : ) yes I have one on my car but it will be coming off when I paint it was there when I bought it...lol
#3
RE: 1991 gt rear end question
That thing is disgusting. Whoever designed it should be shot and thrown in a tank full of hungry sharks.
Get a Cobra wing and a Cobra bumper. www.cervinis.com sells both.
Hatchback and convertible bumpers are the same.
The hatch ends above the taillights just like a convertible's trunk so this awful creation doesnt seal up the trunk or anything like that.
BTW those are the stock taillights on the car in the pics.
Get a Cobra wing and a Cobra bumper. www.cervinis.com sells both.
Hatchback and convertible bumpers are the same.
The hatch ends above the taillights just like a convertible's trunk so this awful creation doesnt seal up the trunk or anything like that.
BTW those are the stock taillights on the car in the pics.
#4
RE: 1991 gt rear end question
Yea I cant believe the company actually designed that....some guy actually thought about it and said damn this looks "cool" haha....F...yea do as he said the cobra stuff is cool that what bumper I have on the back of my car but with a stock LX wing....
#5
RE: 1991 gt rear end question
I hate when people tell me how my car should look, not everyone is like you, see things like you, or want to be you so keep your own taste, by all means opinions are appreciated just dont tell me how my car should look, also i said i only wanted the rear end and i agree that front end doesnt suit it well..
and ty for answering my question
and ty for answering my question
#6
RE: 1991 gt rear end question
Good luck with that kit. I understand why your upset at ppl telling you it will look like crap-it's your car.It honestly doesn't fit what these cars are about and that's what upsetting. BUT, again,it is your car.
Just be prepared to spend more than you paid for the cover to have it prepped and painted, as kits that are lesser known like are generally lower quality, when compared to a kit like Cervini's. Roughly 4 hour prep time, 4 hour paint, plus clear, and the labor to install it= not worth it. That's what I'd write for one of these with the larger surface area.
Just be prepared to spend more than you paid for the cover to have it prepped and painted, as kits that are lesser known like are generally lower quality, when compared to a kit like Cervini's. Roughly 4 hour prep time, 4 hour paint, plus clear, and the labor to install it= not worth it. That's what I'd write for one of these with the larger surface area.
#8
RE: 1991 gt rear end question
ORIGINAL: 50Stocker
Good luck with that kit. I understand why your upset at ppl telling you it will look like crap-it's your car.It honestly doesn't fit what these cars are about and that's what upsetting. BUT, again,it is your car.
Just be prepared to spend more than you paid for the cover to have it prepped and painted, as kits that are lesser known like are generally lower quality, when compared to a kit like Cervini's. Roughly 4 hour prep time, 4 hour paint, plus clear, and the labor to install it= not worth it. That's what I'd write for one of these with the larger surface area.
Good luck with that kit. I understand why your upset at ppl telling you it will look like crap-it's your car.It honestly doesn't fit what these cars are about and that's what upsetting. BUT, again,it is your car.
Just be prepared to spend more than you paid for the cover to have it prepped and painted, as kits that are lesser known like are generally lower quality, when compared to a kit like Cervini's. Roughly 4 hour prep time, 4 hour paint, plus clear, and the labor to install it= not worth it. That's what I'd write for one of these with the larger surface area.
#9
RE: 1991 gt rear end question
lol[:'(]
At least you agree with us that the front end looks horrible. Those bodykits look cheap and ugly as hell on mustangs. Especially foxes. They look alot better stock. But that is only 95% of the mustang communities opinion.
At least you agree with us that the front end looks horrible. Those bodykits look cheap and ugly as hell on mustangs. Especially foxes. They look alot better stock. But that is only 95% of the mustang communities opinion.
#10
RE: 1991 gt rear end question
ORIGINAL: mudvayne1
lol[:'(]
At least you agree with us that the front end looks horrible. Those bodykits look cheap and ugly as hell on mustangs. Especially foxes. They look alot better stock. But that is only 95% of the mustang communities opinion.
lol[:'(]
At least you agree with us that the front end looks horrible. Those bodykits look cheap and ugly as hell on mustangs. Especially foxes. They look alot better stock. But that is only 95% of the mustang communities opinion.