5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

upper and lower controls arm

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 12:34 PM
  #1  
Stroked91's Avatar
Stroked91
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 353
Default upper and lower controls arm

my car currently has ground pounder lower control arms and stock uppers. i am wanting to know if the upr pro series non adjustables are any better then what i have. its not a track car all street might see the track like once or twice. and what kinda difference can i feel goin from 3.55 to 3.73 gears
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 12:44 PM
  #2  
r.barn's Avatar
r.barn
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,263
From:
Default RE: upper and lower controls arm

Wont feel a ton of dif with gear swap, little bit though.

Get Maximum Motor Sports lower control arms and Ford Racing Uppers
only way to go.
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 01:02 PM
  #3  
Stroked91's Avatar
Stroked91
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 353
Default RE: upper and lower controls arm

possibly the reason i asked is causei already have the parts and i am sellin whatever im not gonna use
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 01:15 PM
  #4  
nick_thames's Avatar
nick_thames
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 579
From: SC
Default RE: upper and lower controls arm

I only use UPR products for my suspension. I race but they make quality stuff that is dependable under extremely hard launches. I would get the adjustable ones though. no point in paying a few bucks less for the non adj.
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 02:00 PM
  #5  
r.barn's Avatar
r.barn
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 5,263
From:
Default RE: upper and lower controls arm

Stock upper control arms are fine. You just need to re-bush
them with slightly stiffer upper bushings from Ford Racing.

Lower control arms are the critcal ones.
For street use they need a spherical bearing on one end
to prevent binding. If your cntrl arms have urethane
bushings on both ends it is binding in turns and will
eventual crack your torque boxes.

Ford got around this by putting in weak *** lower bushings
that would flex in turns, and then put in quad shocks to make
up for the weak *** control arms ..... lol
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 03:14 PM
  #6  
andywear87's Avatar
andywear87
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 325
From:
Default RE: upper and lower controls arm

ORIGINAL: r.barn

Wont feel a ton of dif with gear swap, little bit though.

Get Maximum Motor Sports lower control arms and Ford Racing Uppers
only way to go.


why only that setup do you not like the upr rear kits or any others not trying to be arguementive but you are a very smart guy about foxes and want your input.
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 08:15 PM
  #7  
WhiteWindsor's Avatar
WhiteWindsor
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,872
From: Warner Robins,GA
Default RE: upper and lower controls arm

Metco uppers and lowers FTW.
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 09:57 PM
  #8  
roostracing's Avatar
roostracing
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 523
From: Texas
Default RE: upper and lower controls arm

ORIGINAL: nick_thames

I only use UPR products for my suspension. I race but they make quality stuff that is dependable under extremely hard launches. I would get the adjustable ones though. no point in paying a few bucks less for the non adj.
i second this....i use upr products too...cant beat the price and very well made....

Old Dec 13, 2007 | 10:04 PM
  #9  
roostracing's Avatar
roostracing
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 523
From: Texas
Default RE: upper and lower controls arm

ORIGINAL: r.barn

Stock upper control arms are fine. You just need to re-bush
them with slightly stiffer upper bushings from Ford Racing.

Lower control arms are the critcal ones.
For street use they need a spherical bearing on one end
to prevent binding. If your cntrl arms have urethane
bushings on both ends it is binding in turns and will
eventual crack your torque boxes.

Ford got around this by putting in weak *** lower bushings
that would flex in turns, and then put in quad shocks to make
up for the weak *** control arms ..... lol
not true at all...the UPPERS are VERY important because if adjustable (you better buy adjustable) you can adjust PINION ANGLE which is needed for traction...lowers can be fixed....you need to replace both and i would go with the same brand...now the main thing you need to decide on is do you want spherical bushings (noisy, more hardcore, but very strong) or polyurethane bushings (way better than stock, quieter than spherical, but noisier than stock)

if spherical...pinion angle needs to be from -1 degrees to -1.5 degrees

if polyurethane...pinion angle needs to be from -2 degrees to about -3 degrees

take off the quad shocks, get some nice shocks while you are there (strange 10 way adjustable) $69 each and call it a day...
Old Dec 14, 2007 | 09:38 AM
  #10  
Stroked91's Avatar
Stroked91
Thread Starter
2nd Gear Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 353
Default RE: upper and lower controls arm

its a daily driver. i dont see the need to have adjustable control arms. i just wanted to know if there will be any difference goin from ground pounder control arms to upr pro series



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:09 PM.