5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

'72 302 Rebuild

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 09:22 PM
  #11  
jus4fun's Avatar
jus4fun
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 82
From: maryland
Default RE: '72 302 Rebuild

The patriot heads are great for the money, I got a s load of hp out of them. For what I had invested could'nt beat um
Old Mar 7, 2008 | 10:01 PM
  #12  
mjr46's Avatar
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 30,869
From: West Virginia
Default RE: '72 302 Rebuild

ORIGINAL: sstang

I have an intake manifold laying around that I'm considering to use for the build. It's a 289/302 manifold, i believe it has "offenhauser" written on it, and it is set up for two carburetors, and has two four-barrel Carter carbs sitting on top (I believe 450 cfm a piece). Is it worth rebuilding these two carbs and using this set up?
wow 2 4's on a 302...kinda overkill and more so for the look even if they are only 450's a piece
Old Mar 8, 2008 | 07:32 AM
  #13  
sstang's Avatar
sstang
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,663
From: NC
Default RE: '72 302 Rebuild

wow 2 4's on a 302...kinda overkill and more so for the look even if they are only 450's a piece
Lol, yeah I figured it was too much, but figured since I alreadyhad it, maybe it would still be ok to use. It has the vacuum secondary, but do you think it would hurt me?

I also have a 600 cfm Holley four barrel laying around, I would just need a intake for it.
Old Mar 8, 2008 | 08:28 AM
  #14  
mjr46's Avatar
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 30,869
From: West Virginia
Default RE: '72 302 Rebuild

I would go with more of a single 4 set up...I had a friend with the 2 4 set up and it didn't really provide more power just looks
Old Mar 8, 2008 | 04:17 PM
  #15  
sstang's Avatar
sstang
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,663
From: NC
Default RE: '72 302 Rebuild

Well I know they wouldn't add more power since the engine wouldn't be built enough to take advantage of the flow. If I could use them without losing a lot of power though, then I would rather do that because it looks cool and I wouldn't have to buy a manifold.
Old Mar 8, 2008 | 04:49 PM
  #16  
mjr46's Avatar
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 30,869
From: West Virginia
Default RE: '72 302 Rebuild

build a mild 306 and some good heads and it'll work okay ...a guy I knew ..his worked okay
Old Mar 8, 2008 | 06:00 PM
  #17  
sstang's Avatar
sstang
Thread Starter
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,663
From: NC
Default RE: '72 302 Rebuild

I guess it will be a mild build. Things have changed so I will probably have it bored to .040" over (so I guess it will be a 308)with some high compression pistons. It already has a cam, which I believe is a Crane fire ball. I'm going to wait and look for some decent heads and port them, and the exhaust would be free flowing with long tubes. If I topped it with the Offy intake & 2-4's, would that work? Or would there stillbe power to be had with less carburetion?

Also, what is a good streetable compression ratio that can be use with 93 octane?
Old Mar 8, 2008 | 09:02 PM
  #18  
Gary H's Avatar
Gary H
4th Gear Member
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,080
From: Chandler, Az
Default RE: '72 302 Rebuild

The only 351w heads worth using are 69-70. World castings makes some decent priced iron heads too. You might look for a progressive linkage setup for the 2x4 intake. That way you only run off one carb till you jump on it.
http://www.jegs.com/i/Edelbrock/350/7094/10002/-1

Compression ratio with pump gas will depend on the cam alot. 9.5-9.8 should be safe, you cant get 93 octane everywhere. Here in AZ you can only get 91.
Old Mar 8, 2008 | 09:15 PM
  #19  
mjr46's Avatar
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 30,869
From: West Virginia
Default RE: '72 302 Rebuild

no 93 in AZ?? BUMMER.....guess I didn't pay attention to that fact when I was there in December
Old Mar 8, 2008 | 09:47 PM
  #20  
WhiteWindsor's Avatar
WhiteWindsor
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,872
From: Warner Robins,GA
Default RE: '72 302 Rebuild

I run 11.1 compression safely with 93 octane. Biggest factor with running that kind of compression is timing, you dont want it high.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:15 PM.