want to build a high comp n/a 331?!?
#11
RE: want to build a high comp n/a 331?!?
ORIGINAL: 5spd GT
Be careful with some of the suggestions.
A 347 is only as good as the builder. Just because you throw a 3.4" stroke, 5.315" rod, and a 1.175" CH piston, does not mean you will not have problems.
The builder is going to be key here.
A 3.4" stroke, 5.400" rod, and a 1.090" CH piston could still burn oil or live a shorter life, but this is where a good builder can take care of these problems.
The 347 can still "smoke" or last "5,000 miles", but if you get a good builder, you will take care of these problems!
Be careful with some of the suggestions.
A 347 is only as good as the builder. Just because you throw a 3.4" stroke, 5.315" rod, and a 1.175" CH piston, does not mean you will not have problems.
The builder is going to be key here.
A 3.4" stroke, 5.400" rod, and a 1.090" CH piston could still burn oil or live a shorter life, but this is where a good builder can take care of these problems.
The 347 can still "smoke" or last "5,000 miles", but if you get a good builder, you will take care of these problems!
#12
RE: want to build a high comp n/a 331?!?
ORIGINAL: Joel5.0
A "builder" that cannot build a reliable 347 stroker setup......... shouldn't be called a "builder".... nor should it be contracted to build, or rebuild, anything.
A "builder" that cannot build a reliable 347 stroker setup......... shouldn't be called a "builder".... nor should it be contracted to build, or rebuild, anything.
I thought that is EXACTLY what I was saying.
More internet text misinterpreted and wasted....
I know MJR, that was old post before we "chatted", but I want to clarify to anyone reading, that I was just giving out my suggestion, like everyone else in the thread.
It all goes back to that "opinion" thing, which me and MJR have clear now.
#14
RE: want to build a high comp n/a 331?!?
Well, after rereading my original post, it came off as me slamming against CI and FS.
That was not my reason for posting "be careful of some of the suggestions."
My original intent was to be on the lookout for bologna coming...
I hope that clears it up.
That was not my reason for posting "be careful of some of the suggestions."
My original intent was to be on the lookout for bologna coming...
I hope that clears it up.
#15
RE: want to build a high comp n/a 331?!?
ORIGINAL: 5spd GT
Yes, so what is your point Joel?
I thought that is EXACTLY what I was saying.
More internet text misinterpreted and wasted....
I know MJR, that was old post before we "chatted", but I want to clarify to anyone reading, that I was just giving out my suggestion, like everyone else in the thread.
It all goes back to that "opinion" thing, which me and MJR have clear now.
ORIGINAL: Joel5.0
A "builder" that cannot build a reliable 347 stroker setup......... shouldn't be called a "builder".... nor should it be contracted to build, or rebuild, anything.
A "builder" that cannot build a reliable 347 stroker setup......... shouldn't be called a "builder".... nor should it be contracted to build, or rebuild, anything.
I thought that is EXACTLY what I was saying.
More internet text misinterpreted and wasted....
I know MJR, that was old post before we "chatted", but I want to clarify to anyone reading, that I was just giving out my suggestion, like everyone else in the thread.
It all goes back to that "opinion" thing, which me and MJR have clear now.
ORIGINAL: 5spd GT
Be careful with some of the suggestions.
A 347 is only as good as the builder. Just because you throw a 3.4" stroke, 5.315" rod, and a 1.175" CH piston, does not mean you will not have problems.
The builder is going to be key here.
Be careful with some of the suggestions.
A 347 is only as good as the builder. Just because you throw a 3.4" stroke, 5.315" rod, and a 1.175" CH piston, does not mean you will not have problems.
The builder is going to be key here.
Regarding the Subaru pics, stay tuned.
#16
RE: want to build a high comp n/a 331?!?
347, rocks! Hey stinkinlincoln, I run the RPM performers heads which I ported and polished myself, and the comp cam xe294, .558 lift and 112,with a 750 dp.and it will pull like a mother past 7,000, I think maybe you need more fuel or bump the timing till it pings, I get to 42 deg. total advance. I smoked a kid with all the trick flow stuff, so its not that RPMs aren't good, its what you do with them(port and polish) that makes the difference.Also use a coil that makes 50,000 volts, my motor seemed to not make power fast or rev good till I got a master blaster, then wham! Made a world of difference.
#17
RE: want to build a high comp n/a 331?!?
With the wrist-pin intersecting the oil ringland, extra attention does need to be paid attention to. The 306, stock bore 327, 331, and one of the 347 combinations does not have this issue to pay attention to.
You need to worry about the oil ringland support rail, dimple placement, p-w clearance,....
You need to worry about the oil ringland support rail, dimple placement, p-w clearance,....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
0
10-01-2015 09:21 AM
junior04
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
1
09-28-2015 10:53 AM