I was told....
06-08-2008, 10:17 PM
#12
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location:
Posts: 798
RE: I was told....
ORIGINAL: Cocolroo
Hey Adder,
Try not to sound so intelligent....especially when you cant even spell responce.
So according to this thread some GT's werent made with HO(10%)
The reason I was asking is not to sound stupid but when I bought my 89 LX I looked at a 90 GT first that didnt to seem to have as much power to it as mine so dude with helmet said some 5.0 didnt come with HO. I thought they did but im not a Fox body 5.0 specialist like Adder.
Hey Adder,
Try not to sound so intelligent....especially when you cant even spell responce.
So according to this thread some GT's werent made with HO(10%)
The reason I was asking is not to sound stupid but when I bought my 89 LX I looked at a 90 GT first that didnt to seem to have as much power to it as mine so dude with helmet said some 5.0 didnt come with HO. I thought they did but im not a Fox body 5.0 specialist like Adder.
06-08-2008, 10:21 PM
#13
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
RE: I was told....
ORIGINAL: Slo5oh
Your all misinformed. 1982-1984 were designated FHO, factory high output. 85-86 was designated EHO, emmisions controled high output. 87-93 were all regular HO motors, but only in GT's and only the first 10,000 produced each year. The others were called HPO High performance opperations. None were designated on the intake, they were all labled 5.0 h.o.
If you believe that I have a bridge to sell you.
Your all misinformed. 1982-1984 were designated FHO, factory high output. 85-86 was designated EHO, emmisions controled high output. 87-93 were all regular HO motors, but only in GT's and only the first 10,000 produced each year. The others were called HPO High performance opperations. None were designated on the intake, they were all labled 5.0 h.o.
If you believe that I have a bridge to sell you.
the last part of your quote is what this discusion has been about not the prefix before the h.o that no one ever hears or recognizes.......I have read many times what you have posted and don't disagree... good post though
06-08-2008, 10:40 PM
#14
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mount Laurel, NJ
Posts: 1,206
RE: I was told....
ORIGINAL: mjr46
the last part of your quote is what this discusion has been about not the prefix before the h.o that no one ever hears or recognizes.......I have read many times what you have posted and don't disagree... good post though
ORIGINAL: Slo5oh
Your all misinformed. 1982-1984 were designated FHO, factory high output. 85-86 was designated EHO, emmisions controled high output. 87-93 were all regular HO motors, but only in GT's and only the first 10,000 produced each year. The others were called HPO High performance opperations. None were designated on the intake, they were all labled 5.0 h.o.
If you believe that I have a bridge to sell you.
Your all misinformed. 1982-1984 were designated FHO, factory high output. 85-86 was designated EHO, emmisions controled high output. 87-93 were all regular HO motors, but only in GT's and only the first 10,000 produced each year. The others were called HPO High performance opperations. None were designated on the intake, they were all labled 5.0 h.o.
If you believe that I have a bridge to sell you.
the last part of your quote is what this discusion has been about not the prefix before the h.o that no one ever hears or recognizes.......I have read many times what you have posted and don't disagree... good post though
In all seriousness. They all have 5.0 H.O in some form or another on them. End discussion.
