5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

afr 165 vs performer rpm

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-12-2008, 12:46 PM
  #1  
2broke2gofast
Thread Starter
 
2broke2gofast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 49
Default afr 165 vs performer rpm

I've had a set of afr's and it looks like I've screwed'em up enough that its gonna be cheaper to get new heads. Will I see the same power with the performer rpm's? Or would you recommend repairing the afrs for $800!
2broke2gofast is offline  
Old 09-12-2008, 01:42 PM
  #2  
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
Default

so what got screwed up on the afr's???
mjr46 is offline  
Old 09-12-2008, 01:48 PM
  #3  
5.0stanger
6th Gear Member
 
5.0stanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Howard City, MI
Posts: 5,956
Default

800 is less than new heads...
5.0stanger is offline  
Old 09-12-2008, 02:06 PM
  #4  
2broke2gofast
Thread Starter
 
2broke2gofast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 49
Default

warpped all exhaust valves over-revving and wore the guides using too long pushrods the past three years. Two hundred dollars more for the performers....
2broke2gofast is offline  
Old 09-12-2008, 02:35 PM
  #5  
maroon89lsc
 
maroon89lsc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: fort worth,texas
Posts: 23
Default

afr > edelbrock afrs flow more thus produceing more power.in my opinion i would just spend the money on the afrs.just my .02

Last edited by maroon89lsc; 09-12-2008 at 02:38 PM.
maroon89lsc is offline  
Old 09-12-2008, 02:41 PM
  #6  
maroon89lsc
 
maroon89lsc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: fort worth,texas
Posts: 23
Default

where are you getting the valves and valve guides?
maroon89lsc is offline  
Old 09-12-2008, 03:12 PM
  #7  
primetime5.0
6th Gear Member
 
primetime5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 9,587
Default

just because they flow more doesnt mean it'll make more power..
primetime5.0 is offline  
Old 09-12-2008, 03:35 PM
  #8  
2broke2gofast
Thread Starter
 
2broke2gofast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 49
Default

where ever is the cheapest. Thing is, the car wasnt smoking any, do you think I would have to replace the guides??
2broke2gofast is offline  
Old 09-12-2008, 03:37 PM
  #9  
maroon89lsc
 
maroon89lsc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: fort worth,texas
Posts: 23
Default

to much air flow will kill your torque is what ive heard.but on a heads,cam,intake car the afr heads are going to pull away from the edelbrocks.this is box stock to box stock.
maroon89lsc is offline  
Old 09-12-2008, 03:39 PM
  #10  
maroon89lsc
 
maroon89lsc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: fort worth,texas
Posts: 23
Default

have you taken them to a machine shop or taken them apart?
maroon89lsc is offline  


Quick Reply: afr 165 vs performer rpm



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:22 PM.