5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Opinions please, stud mount or pedestal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-06-2008, 02:52 PM
  #1  
SteveSkal
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
SteveSkal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 479
Default Opinions please, stud mount or pedestal

I am in the process of head selection for my 331 stroker and I want to get the AFR 185 heads, the question is do I get stud mount or pedestal mount rockers? I have several variables that are making this decision tougher, I like the ease of the pedestal mounts and this engine will never see more than 6500 RPM so should be fine but for some reason AFR only makes the pedestal mount heads in 60CC chambers and I need 58CC to put the compression where I want it. So only stud mount in 58CC chambers but in my 94 I won't be able to fit stud mount rockers under my valve covers! The other option then would be get the 60CC pedestal heads and mill them to get 58CC chambers but then wouldn't that throw off my pushrod length? The doesn't seem to be an easy answer here. Your thoughts and suggestions please
SteveSkal is offline  
Old 11-06-2008, 03:01 PM
  #2  
Derf00
Gentleman's Relish
 
Derf00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 13,090
Default

New valve covers then? If the stud mount would work but you won't have the Valve cover clearance that would sound like the most simple solution. Perhaps not the most cost effective, but the easiest.
Derf00 is offline  
Old 11-06-2008, 05:50 PM
  #3  
SteveSkal
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
SteveSkal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 479
Default

Yeah I thought of that as well and looked into it which opened up a whole nother can of worms, not only are taller valve covers for the 94/95 very rare, they are expensive as hell and then I'd need a spacer between my upper and lower intake so they will fit. Again, there doesn't seem to be an easy answer.
SteveSkal is offline  
Old 11-06-2008, 06:11 PM
  #4  
woodsy
3rd Gear Member
 
woodsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 755
Default

Pedestal are useless, wish they would have never been produced, right along with 3/8ths rocker studs, another useless item. 7/16 stud mount and move along
woodsy is offline  
Old 11-06-2008, 06:30 PM
  #5  
Timspony
SVT Section Moderator
 
Timspony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Burnt Hills, NY
Posts: 15,601
Default

+1 on the stud mount rockers here!
Timspony is offline  
Old 11-06-2008, 06:51 PM
  #6  
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
Default

run stud mount rockers...my 3/8's on my 347 have worked just fine this past year
mjr46 is offline  
Old 11-06-2008, 07:07 PM
  #7  
silver91gt
5th Gear Member
 
silver91gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 3,195
Default

stud mount is so much easier to set up the lifter preload, but if you dont already have stud mount rockers you will need a set, as well as hardened pushrods.

If your stuck on the afr 185 you will want to get a set of longer rocker studs for a smallblock chevy to replace the short ones they send with the head.
I had 3 of my stock afr ones break after 1500kms, and thats when I found out that the poly-lock was only on like 1/16 of an inch.

the valvecover selection should be the same as any fox mustang.
I fit my stock valvecovers with my afr 185 and roller rockers, and the only modification I had to do was to remove the baffle inside the passenger side cover.

I since went to some sheet metal valvecovers and needed to use a 3/8 spacer to clear them as there 3.5 inches high.
silver91gt is offline  
Old 11-06-2008, 07:20 PM
  #8  
uedlose
5th Gear Member
 
uedlose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Charles Town WV
Posts: 2,288
Default

studs the only way to go.
uedlose is offline  
Old 11-06-2008, 07:25 PM
  #9  
mjr46
D.R. THE PATHETIC DORK
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 30,863
Default

Originally Posted by silver91gt
stud mount is so much easier to set up the lifter preload, but if you dont already have stud mount rockers you will need a set, as well as hardened pushrods.

If your stuck on the afr 185 you will want to get a set of longer rocker studs for a smallblock chevy to replace the short ones they send with the head.
I had 3 of my stock afr ones break after 1500kms, and thats when I found out that the poly-lock was only on like 1/16 of an inch.

the valvecover selection should be the same as any fox mustang.
I fit my stock valvecovers with my afr 185 and roller rockers, and the only modification I had to do was to remove the baffle inside the passenger side cover.

I since went to some sheet metal valvecovers and needed to use a 3/8 spacer to clear them as there 3.5 inches high.
LOL...I had to do the same thing on my afr's
mjr46 is offline  
Old 11-07-2008, 01:26 PM
  #10  
84gtcustom
2nd Gear Member
 
84gtcustom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Indiana
Posts: 178
Default

wahts the big diff between stud and pedestal? I've got ped rockers for my DD build. should I look into stud?

not treing to jack the thread sorry
84gtcustom is offline  


Quick Reply: Opinions please, stud mount or pedestal



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:44 AM.