5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

which are the better years

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-10-2009, 10:28 AM
  #1  
nitrous_fed_03gt
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
nitrous_fed_03gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: mo
Posts: 919
Default which are the better years

im lookin to buy a 5.0 but am unsure which years to choose from? did they all have forged pistons???? which years have the strongest motors and trannys? thanks
nitrous_fed_03gt is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 11:11 AM
  #2  
ctgreddy
6th Gear Member
 
ctgreddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Dearborn, MI
Posts: 6,277
Default

are you looking for between a 87-93? if so they all had the same trans. they all had forged pistons other than the 93. 87-most 88's had speed density the rest have maf. in 1990 they started with airbags and ditched tilt steering wheels. so i'd look for an 89 lx. its the lightest due to no air bags, has tilt steer, forged pistons, and maf.
ctgreddy is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 11:16 AM
  #3  
1BIGMOFO
5th Gear Member
 
1BIGMOFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 2,450
Default

Im gonna say go for the new body style and get a 94-95, 5.0. but the late 80's - early 90's notch's are very popular because they are very light.
1BIGMOFO is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 11:36 AM
  #4  
Timspony
SVT Section Moderator
 
Timspony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Burnt Hills, NY
Posts: 15,601
Default

...87-92 5L Mustang's have Forged pistons! ...I would go with a mass-air Pony, 1989-92 (forged piston's) and look for the best deal!
Timspony is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 01:57 PM
  #5  
nitrous_fed_03gt
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
nitrous_fed_03gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: mo
Posts: 919
Default

so im assuming then that the 94-95 gt did not have forged pistons??? if so, then im also assuming the other years can handle a greater deal of more power on stock internals???
nitrous_fed_03gt is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 02:12 PM
  #6  
5.0stang123
2nd Gear Member
 
5.0stang123's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Courtenay B.C
Posts: 405
Default

Originally Posted by ctgreddy
are you looking for between a 87-93? if so they all had the same trans. they all had forged pistons other than the 93. 87-most 88's had speed density the rest have maf. in 1990 they started with airbags and ditched tilt steering wheels. so i'd look for an 89 lx. its the lightest due to no air bags, has tilt steer, forged pistons, and maf.
Lol does the air bags really make that much difference? Is it really worth the small weight savings for worse safty?
5.0stang123 is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 02:44 PM
  #7  
88E303stanggt
 
88E303stanggt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 28
Default

Originally Posted by 5.0stang123
Lol does the air bags really make that much difference? Is it really worth the small weight savings for worse safty?
saving ~5lbs VS possibly blowing your brains out on a steering wheel in a headon collision.

But to answer OPs question. I would say, if you want a fox, go with 90-92 5.0 notch.
88E303stanggt is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 03:48 PM
  #8  
Timspony
SVT Section Moderator
 
Timspony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Burnt Hills, NY
Posts: 15,601
Default

Originally Posted by nitrous_fed_03gt
so im assuming then that the 94-95 gt did not have forged pistons??? if so, then im also assuming the other years can handle a greater deal of more power on stock internals???
Correct! 93-95 5L Mustangs had hypereutectic pistons!
Timspony is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 04:05 PM
  #9  
nitrous_fed_03gt
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
nitrous_fed_03gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: mo
Posts: 919
Default

thanks for making up my mind for me guys. looks like i will be going for an 87-92. so whats the pros and cons of having and not having the mass air years
nitrous_fed_03gt is offline  
Old 02-10-2009, 04:13 PM
  #10  
OneGearhead
6th Gear Member
 
OneGearhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: VA
Posts: 5,867
Default

Originally Posted by nitrous_fed_03gt
thanks for making up my mind for me guys. looks like i will be going for an 87-92. so whats the pros and cons of having and not having the mass air years

when you have a speed density system('87/'88), the pcm doesnt take to mods as well. you have a limited amount of cam grinds to work with and its just more picky about adding little things. cold air kits, cams, heads, etc, etc. pretty much anything top end of the engine work. the maf cars respond MUCH BETTER to mods. granted you can always get a chip and try it like that to see if it would work, but normally, people just upgrade to a maf system to be on the safe side. i think a SD to MAF system conversion is $300-400.....to make things easy, if you plan on doing engine work, just grap an '89-'92. that way, you have the maf system and forged internals.
OneGearhead is offline  


Quick Reply: which are the better years



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:15 PM.