5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

Is a '92 5.0 reliable???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-26-2005, 10:38 PM
  #11  
MrFedEx503
2nd Gear Member
 
MrFedEx503's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location:
Posts: 181
Default RE: Is a '92 5.0 reliable???

damn looks like my ride except i dont got that ugly cowl hood with the matchin ugly GT cheese grater tail lights
MrFedEx503 is offline  
Old 06-26-2005, 10:42 PM
  #12  
MrFedEx503
2nd Gear Member
 
MrFedEx503's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location:
Posts: 181
Default RE: Is a '92 5.0 reliable???

and is it just me or do those 5.0 tags look outta place? they look higher
MrFedEx503 is offline  
Old 06-26-2005, 11:53 PM
  #13  
Black Snake
5th Gear Member
 
Black Snake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location:
Posts: 3,721
Default RE: Is a '92 5.0 reliable???

Yeah its a smige too high.
Black Snake is offline  
Old 06-27-2005, 12:02 AM
  #14  
JD1969
Pro. B.S. caller outer
 
JD1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: IL
Posts: 9,644
Default RE: Is a '92 5.0 reliable???

IMO I would not buy it for $4000, yes it looks good but the cowl hood and the out of place badges would make me wary. Why does it have a cowl hood? Maybe he swaped motors on it and it was raced. The 5.0 badges being out of place is a clue that it has had body work (again so is the hood). Keep looking for a few weeks I bet you find one that is just as nice for a better price, or get him down to $3000/$3500 tops.
JD1969 is offline  
Old 06-27-2005, 12:39 AM
  #15  
Grey Fox
1st Gear Member
 
Grey Fox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location:
Posts: 125
Default RE: Is a '92 5.0 reliable???

Run a carfax on it. $4000 is high for a car with a primered hood. Nice looking car otherwise, except for the idiot that installed the 5.0 badges.

At most $3500 if carfax comes up clean. Rip out that damn chip the minute your name is on the title, too...they're junk.
Grey Fox is offline  
Old 06-27-2005, 12:46 AM
  #16  
dc_mann8
5th Gear Member
 
dc_mann8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PEI, Canada
Posts: 2,985
Default RE: Is a '92 5.0 reliable???

the badges are WAY too high.. but i think its worth 3500 for sure. he could get 5000 around here.
dc_mann8 is offline  
Old 06-27-2005, 12:53 AM
  #17  
settled4automatic
3rd Gear Member
 
settled4automatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location:
Posts: 613
Default RE: Is a '92 5.0 reliable???

yeah, i just drove to new jersey from illinois to get my 88gt last weekend :P $3200 for a great little car that would be $6000 around here. i almost want to advertise it for 6 or 7k just to see what happens nice car you got there tho, but if foxes are common in your area, i would keep looking. post some more pics if ya can, lets see the rest of it!
settled4automatic is offline  
Old 06-27-2005, 04:38 AM
  #18  
hatingyou
2nd Gear Member
 
hatingyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location:
Posts: 196
Default RE: Is a '92 5.0 reliable???

Yeah, where I live foxes are pretty rare, especially GT's. My GT was about in the same condition as that one (except the hood/badges) and had a door that had to be replaced, and I still payed I think 4,700 or so. Mine had about 120,000 miles when I bought it though. If you know anyone that could check the car out that would be good. My bro is a mechanic and he checked out my car for me before I bought it. Just a thought.
hatingyou is offline  
Old 06-27-2005, 05:18 AM
  #19  
MrFedEx503
2nd Gear Member
 
MrFedEx503's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location:
Posts: 181
Default RE: Is a '92 5.0 reliable???

damn ya'll paying some money for those FOX's. Mine was 6,200 with only 65,000 miles on it. with 3.55 gears, mac cold air intake, power pullies and a few other lil things.
MrFedEx503 is offline  
Old 06-27-2005, 05:39 AM
  #20  
flamin87
2nd Gear Member
 
flamin87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location:
Posts: 241
Default RE: Is a '92 5.0 reliable???

how come the badges on the other pics. are now lower?? did anybody notice that?
flamin87 is offline  


Quick Reply: Is a '92 5.0 reliable???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:35 AM.