When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
5.0L (1979-1995) MustangTechnical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.
Ok edumacate me. I dont see why this wouldnt hit mid 300rwhp. I know plent of guys running sumilar set ups, but FI. Same cam but out of the box 165's tfs's and edelbrock just like the one he has. and they are making from 280-305rwhp on a 302. Why would it make the same or less on a 347? if its running slugish my guess there is something else wrong. I had a e cam before and it was no too bad. with stock long block and the ecam i made 247 rwhp.
assume stock heads, stock cam, and the stock carb, but on a 347 stroker. what kind of hp numbers am i looking at? the higher displacement and stroke must account for something?
assume stock heads, stock cam, and the stock carb, but on a 347 stroker. what kind of hp numbers am i looking at? the higher displacement and stroke must account for something?
not much when you choke it.......since you have more cylinder volume to fill now and are using the same stock cam, stock heads and induction that were designed for a 302 stroke, how will you effectively fill the new found displacement adequately to it's fullest potential?? you won't and you will gauranteed be under 300 rwhp then
im saying its a ok cam. its not the best. and also you had gt40 heads intake, exhaust ect. also a tune if i remember correctly adder. you have a cobra, so common adder you cant compare yours to mine....