sn95
4th Gear Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,259
From: California
RE: sn95
I drove sn95s and fox bodies, and the fox is definitely faster but the SN95s are better in a lot of ways. In my opinion they look better, have better interior, and the 4 wheel disc brakes is nice. Plus they arent much slower, they run a 15.1 or 15.2. Most foxes are a high 14 or mid 14 stock. This probably dont matter to most but the ladies like the sn95 much better also lol
1st Gear Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 119
From:
RE: sn95
ORIGINAL: seanjohncombs001
I drove sn95s and fox bodies, and the fox is definitely faster but the SN95s are better in a lot of ways. In my opinion they look better, have better interior, and the 4 wheel disc brakes is nice. Plus they arent much slower, they run a 15.1 or 15.2. Most foxes are a high 14 or mid 14 stock. This probably dont matter to most but the ladies like the sn95 much better also lol
I drove sn95s and fox bodies, and the fox is definitely faster but the SN95s are better in a lot of ways. In my opinion they look better, have better interior, and the 4 wheel disc brakes is nice. Plus they arent much slower, they run a 15.1 or 15.2. Most foxes are a high 14 or mid 14 stock. This probably dont matter to most but the ladies like the sn95 much better also lol
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 461
From:
RE: sn95
Xgreg your car looks similar to the one on this site ...http://www.turbochargedpower.com/94-95%20Mustang.htm
i thought you owned that car in your sig??
i thought you owned that car in your sig??
2nd Gear Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 161
From:
RE: sn95
yeah i just saw that car on the hp's website, and i noticed the intercooler behind the bumper. you dont state anywhere in your post up there about you having a turbo in your 94. so, i hope you were just joking about that being your car in the pic.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post