#$%& MAC Headers!!!
09-09-2005, 07:03 PM
#14
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: California
Posts: 1,657
RE: #$%& MAC Headers!!!
I have no problems with my MAC equal lenght headers, I have accel 8mm wires with 90* degree boot and accel racing mini plugs, work great! sorry to hear about your probs. good luck.
09-09-2005, 07:33 PM
#15
Pro. B.S. caller outer
Join Date: May 2004
Location: IL
Posts: 9,644
RE: #$%& MAC Headers!!!
ORIGINAL: Quik
its a lovely thing to hear others complain about MAC. just things ive been speaking of for a while now
its a lovely thing to hear others complain about MAC. just things ive been speaking of for a while now
09-09-2005, 07:41 PM
#16
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location:
Posts: 53
RE: #$%& MAC Headers!!!
ORIGINAL: JD1969
Whats funny is that the Ls1 guys have very few if any problems with the MAC headers, it could be because not many people use them as they are mid-lengths and almost everyone that has an LS1 uses longtubes. I did have a set of MAC's that I never put on my car and looked to be ok quality wise. It wierd that so many Stang guys have trouble with them. I will say this though, the MAC catback that Sidewayz had on his 99 GT sounded really good.
ORIGINAL: Quik
its a lovely thing to hear others complain about MAC. just things ive been speaking of for a while now
its a lovely thing to hear others complain about MAC. just things ive been speaking of for a while now
09-09-2005, 08:04 PM
#17
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 5,182
RE: #$%& MAC Headers!!!
kinda worthless to put midlenghts on Fbodys. LTs are the way to go but funny thing is stock GEN III manifolds actually flow very well. the gain of LTs over stock manifolds on a GEN III motor was like 2hp
09-10-2005, 03:08 AM
#18
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 854
RE: #$%& MAC Headers!!!
i'm sorry you are having problems . i have used mac exhaust on several mustangs with no problems . they are not the best you can buy , but they do not cost as much as the best either. i like mac for the money. good luck.
09-10-2005, 11:56 AM
#19
Pro. B.S. caller outer
Join Date: May 2004
Location: IL
Posts: 9,644
RE: #$%& MAC Headers!!!
ORIGINAL: Quik
kinda worthless to put midlenghts on Fbodys. LTs are the way to go but funny thing is stock GEN III manifolds actually flow very well. the gain of LTs over stock manifolds on a GEN III motor was like 2hp
kinda worthless to put midlenghts on Fbodys. LTs are the way to go but funny thing is stock GEN III manifolds actually flow very well. the gain of LTs over stock manifolds on a GEN III motor was like 2hp
09-10-2005, 01:07 PM
#20
I ♥ Acer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location:
Posts: 11,394
RE: #$%& MAC Headers!!!
jd I bet that was what we call ear horsepower
as it sounds like 15 more hps
guy like any other thing made for nothing there will be defects..even in JBA headers that cost twice as much even kook that cost about 4 times as much
but as far as any plug wires burning is the users fault
as it sounds like 15 more hpsguy like any other thing made for nothing there will be defects..even in JBA headers that cost twice as much even kook that cost about 4 times as much
but as far as any plug wires burning is the users fault