5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

93 Mustang

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 12:26 AM
  #1  
Gorg_Stang's Avatar
Gorg_Stang
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 54
From:
Default 93 Mustang

I am looking at buying a 93 mustang. My dad says that the 93 isn't a good year to buy. What do you all think out there?
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 12:28 AM
  #2  
mkspeed26's Avatar
mkspeed26
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,392
From: Rochester, NY
Default RE: 93 Mustang

not a good year to buy compared to what? other fox body years? mustangs in general? cars in general?
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 12:31 AM
  #3  
Gorg_Stang's Avatar
Gorg_Stang
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 54
From:
Default RE: 93 Mustang

Other fox body years and other mustangs. Something about it being too boxy. Is this a good year to go with or not? I just need more info on this car b4 I make the decision to buy.
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 12:36 AM
  #4  
NegadivOne's Avatar
NegadivOne
3rd Gear Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 683
From: Tigard, OR
Default RE: 93 Mustang

it is the same body as the other 87-93 mustangs
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 12:36 AM
  #5  
mkspeed26's Avatar
mkspeed26
5th Gear Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,392
From: Rochester, NY
Default RE: 93 Mustang

so he is sayin it is a bad car because it is too boxy? well, go through and look at the foxes in here. look at my car domain site, look at obsol3te's car, look at all of the foxes in here and decide for yourself if it is too "boxy". and being too boxy has nothing to do with if it a good car or not, which it definately is
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 12:37 AM
  #6  
mallory's Avatar
mallory
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 105
From:
Default RE: 93 Mustang

hell if i was you and the car was in my price range i would buy that car today...and start saving money for the mods to put on it...as long as the previous owner aint wreched it or caught it on fire...there is nothing wrong with a 93 mustang...
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 12:40 AM
  #7  
Gorg_Stang's Avatar
Gorg_Stang
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 54
From:
Default RE: 93 Mustang

ok. so there isn't anything with the 93's. i just sold my 89 and want something else to invest some money into. i just don't want a bad year or anything like that. such as f****** 95 dodge diseals
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 12:43 AM
  #8  
Gorg_Stang's Avatar
Gorg_Stang
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 54
From:
Default RE: 93 Mustang

ok next question...what would that year of stang be worth. the car that i am lookin at has never been wrecked. needs a paint job really bad, some rust, engine needs some work, just minor problems!
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 01:19 AM
  #9  
92hatchLX's Avatar
92hatchLX
6th Gear Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,439
From:
Default RE: 93 Mustang

Hey buddy, Samantha just told me about the car, the only thing that I don't like about it is the hyperpetouric (sp) pistons, good luck though, is it a hatch or a notch? How many miles are on it.
Old Nov 7, 2005 | 01:22 AM
  #10  
Gorg_Stang's Avatar
Gorg_Stang
Thread Starter
1st Gear Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 54
From:
Default RE: 93 Mustang

convertible...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:42 AM.