5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang Technical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.

carb-vs-injection

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-09-2005, 04:39 PM
  #1  
5.0mustang5speed
I ♥ Acer
Thread Starter
 
5.0mustang5speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location:
Posts: 477
Default carb-vs-injection

im sure this has been beatin to death but i cant find it no where in the search, so here goes...say you have a tuned carb-intake set up say a 750 with a victor intake, and you put a injected victor intake and all hardware(tb.mass air) with it on the motor with 36pound injectors which one will make more power if any
5.0mustang5speed is offline  
Old 11-09-2005, 04:44 PM
  #2  
waxyourboard
3rd Gear Member
 
waxyourboard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sarasota/Orlando, Florida
Posts: 614
Default RE: carb-vs-injection

Depends on the tune, you can get just as much power out of a carb setup, it just takes a lot more effort to fine tune it. With same tuning, fuel injection might make 5-10 more horse, if you go with some sort of cold air intake
waxyourboard is offline  
Old 11-09-2005, 05:26 PM
  #3  
mkspeed26
5th Gear Member
 
mkspeed26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 2,392
Default RE: carb-vs-injection

EFI can get power throughout the rpm range, but carb can get more power in a specific rpm range. but the winner for me is that modding an EFI car is fuggin expensive, where a carb is dirt cheap. not to mention there isnt nearly as much electrical sh*t to go wrong and there is less weight
mkspeed26 is offline  
Old 11-09-2005, 05:28 PM
  #4  
91stang
4th Gear Member
 
91stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,860
Default RE: carb-vs-injection

ORIGINAL: mkspeed26

EFI can get power throughout the rpm range, but carb can get more power in a specific rpm range. but the winner for me is that modding an EFI car is fuggin expensive, where a carb is dirt cheap. not to mention there isnt nearly as much electrical sh*t to go wrong and there is less weight
true that
91stang is offline  
Old 11-09-2005, 06:19 PM
  #5  
Sinister Audio
2nd Gear Member
 
Sinister Audio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location:
Posts: 487
Default RE: carb-vs-injection

i like to keep FI cars all FI unless it was going to be a pure drag car. carbs kinda take the fun out of the FI but on the other hand if you have a carbed motor its really easy to make some power and cheap.
Sinister Audio is offline  
Old 11-09-2005, 06:19 PM
  #6  
5.0mustang5speed
I ♥ Acer
Thread Starter
 
5.0mustang5speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location:
Posts: 477
Default RE: carb-vs-injection

ok, cool than i will just keep my carb set up cause i would have to piece the injection togetgher along with the painless wiring kit and fuel upgrades
5.0mustang5speed is offline  
Old 11-09-2005, 06:59 PM
  #7  
vfast
I ♥ Acer
 
vfast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location:
Posts: 11,394
Default RE: carb-vs-injection

well try this buy the intake have it drilled for injector...then you can play with both...pull the injector.dist. etc sit the car on it
vfast is offline  
Old 11-09-2005, 08:15 PM
  #8  
tinman
5th Gear Member
 
tinman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 4,103
Default RE: carb-vs-injection

Then there is the dact that the Eddy intake may not be the end -all intake either.
Think 'Funnel Ram'.....
tinman is offline  




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:10 AM.