When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
5.0L (1979-1995) MustangTechnical discussions on 5.0 Liter Mustangs within. This does not include the 5.0 from the 2011 Mustang GT. That information is in the 2005-1011 section.
Sorry guys I didnt dyno my car "if you cared anyway" but here is another very interesting thing to look at and too consider what mine could really be making now. Now you will see that I have better compression, better carb, better heads,better headers, better intake, mabye less% drop from my manual,but not a better cam. Could my combo come out to be better or worse than what his is. What do you all think ?This is a person on another forum who just got his car dynod the results were: </P>
All values are “Read Wheel Values”
Engine;
1990 5.0-HO Bottom end with 8.5:1 flat tops, Ford Racing X-303 Cam, Ford Racing Y-303 Heads with Crane Gold 1.6 rockers, Performer RPM and a 1406-600 CFM Carb, Doug Thorly “Try-Y” headers into a full flow “X” crossover straight pipe exhaust using only 12" glass packs.
Transmission;
1966 Costume Built C-4 with an 10” “Edge Racing “ 2600 rpm stall torque converter.
</P>
Ya hopefully... Thing thats wierd is that 21 people looked at this and only one helped me out? I try and help out everyone. Jeez.. karma is Bulls**t sometimes.
quit ya whinnin*L*
a cam will help..he lost a ton on the bottom end. the demon carb is nice I think you need a diff. cam. your hp will be in about 800-1000 rpm less.. so you be in the 5k range
Ive heard from other people that his combo is all wrong because he went with the X-303. Which is true because that cam is for high compression, and manual transmission. Which he does not have. I should make more horsepower than him right ? His dyno also coulda been wrong </P>